C# icon

Top Alternatives to C#

Looking for C# alternatives? We've curated 29 top alternatives that offer similar functionality. Whether you need options, free plans, or open source solutions, explore our comprehensive list to find the perfect fit for your needs.

Open Source More about C#
Categories:
Platforms:
Python

Python

Open Source

Python is a versatile, high-level programming language renowned for its readability and simplicity. It supports multiple programming paradigms, including object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. It boasts a large and active community, extensive libraries, and is widely used for web development, data science, artificial intelligence, and scripting.

Key Features

  • Easy to learn and read.
  • Large and active community.
  • Extensive collection of libraries.

vs C#

Easy to learn and read. compared to C#
Java

Java

Free

Java is a widely-used, object-oriented, general-purpose programming language designed to have as few implementation dependencies as possible. Its core principle, "write once, run anywhere" (WORA), allows compiled Java code to run on any platform that supports Java without the need for recompilation.

Key Features

  • Platform Independent (Write Once, Run Anywhere)
  • Large and mature ecosystem with extensive libraries and frameworks
  • Automatic memory management (Garbage Collection)

vs C#

Platform Independent (Write Once, Run Anywhere) compared to C#
C (programming language)

C is a foundational, imperative programming language renowned for its efficiency and low-level access. It serves as a bedrock for systems programming, operating systems, and performance-critical applications, providing direct control over hardware through features like manual memory management.

Key Features

  • High performance due to direct compilation to machine code.
  • Provides low-level control over memory and hardware.
  • Excellent for systems programming and embedded development.

vs C#

High performance due to direct compilation to machine code. compared to C#
C++

C++

Open Source

C++ is a powerful, general-purpose programming language renowned for its performance and flexibility. It supports procedural, object-oriented, generic, and functional programming paradigms, making it suitable for a wide range of applications from system software to video games.

Key Features

  • Exceptional performance and efficiency due to low-level control.
  • Supports multiple programming paradigms for flexibility.
  • Comprehensive and highly optimized standard library.

vs C#

Exceptional performance and efficiency due to low-level control. compared to C#
Ruby

Ruby

Open Source

Ruby is a dynamic, open-source programming language known for its elegant syntax and focus on developer productivity. It's widely used for web development, scripting, and rapid prototyping.

Key Features

  • Elegant and readable syntax
  • High developer productivity
  • Strong ecosystem with RubyGems

vs C#

Elegant and readable syntax compared to C#
Lua

Lua

Open Source

Lua is a powerful, fast, and lightweight scripting language designed for embedding in applications. It's known for its simplicity, portability, and efficiency, making it ideal for a wide range of uses from embedded systems to game development and configuration.

Key Features

  • Extremely lightweight and fast
  • Easy to embed into other applications
  • Simple and easy-to-learn syntax

vs C#

Extremely lightweight and fast compared to C#
Perl

Perl

Open Source

Perl is a highly-capable, feature-rich programming language with over 30 years of development. Widely used for text processing, web development, and systems administration, it is known for its power and flexibility.

Key Features

  • Excellent text processing capabilities with powerful regular expressions.
  • Large and comprehensive module repository (CPAN).
  • Strong integration with the operating system shell.

vs C#

Excellent text processing capabilities with powerful regular expressions. compared to C#
Go (Programming Language)

Go (Golang) is an open-source, statically typed, compiled programming language designed at Google. Known for its concurrency primitives, garbage collection, and focus on simplicity, Go is well-suited for building scalable, high-performance applications, particularly in networking, cloud services, and microservices.

Key Features

  • Excellent concurrency support with goroutines and channels.
  • Fast compilation times lead to rapid development cycles.
  • Efficient garbage collection simplifies memory management.

vs C#

Excellent concurrency support with goroutines and channels. compared to C#
Dart

Dart

Open Source

Dart is an open-source, client-optimized programming language for building fast apps on any platform. It offers a productive development experience and high performance.

Key Features

  • Excellent for building cross-platform applications with Flutter.
  • Strong tooling and features like hot-reload boost developer productivity.
  • Flexible compilation to native code or JavaScript for performance and reach.

vs C#

Excellent for building cross-platform applications with Flutter. compared to C#
Scala

Scala

Open Source

Scala is a powerful, general-purpose programming language designed to combine the best features of object-oriented and functional programming paradigms.

Key Features

  • Excellent blend of object-oriented and functional programming.
  • Strong static type system catches errors early.
  • Seamless interoperability with Java and the JVM ecosystem.

vs C#

Excellent blend of object-oriented and functional programming. compared to C#
Haskell

Haskell

Open Source

Haskell is a powerful, statically typed, purely functional programming language. It emphasizes immutability and mathematical purity, leading to robust and maintainable code. Ideal for applications demanding correctness and concurrency.

Key Features

  • High code reliability due to strong static typing and purity.
  • Excellent support for concurrency and parallelism.
  • More maintainable code due to immutability and functional paradigm.

vs C#

High code reliability due to strong static typing and purity. compared to C#
Rust

Rust

Open Source

Rust is a multi-paradigm, general-purpose programming language designed for performance and safety, especially safe concurrency. It's ideal for systems programming and performance-critical applications.

Key Features

  • Guaranteed memory safety without garbage collection.
  • Excellent performance, comparable to C/C++.
  • Fearless concurrency due to language design.

vs C#

Guaranteed memory safety without garbage collection. compared to C#
D (Programming Language)

D is a general-purpose systems and application programming language that aims to combine the power and high performance of C++ with the productivity and safety of modern languages like Python or Ruby.

Key Features

  • Excellent performance comparable to C/C++.
  • Strong safety features reduce common programming errors.
  • Modern language features enhance developer productivity.

vs C#

Excellent performance comparable to C/C++. compared to C#
Julia

Julia

Open Source

Julia is a high-level, dynamic programming language designed for technical computing with performance comparable to traditional compiled languages. It excels in numerical analysis, data science, and scientific computing, offering a flexible environment for both rapid prototyping and high-performance code.

Key Features

  • Exceptional performance for numerical computations, often comparable to C or Fortran.
  • Flexible and dynamic language with a relatively clean syntax.
  • Powerful multiple dispatch system enhances code reusability and extensibility.

vs C#

Exceptional performance for numerical computations, often comparable to C or Fortran. compared to C#
Haxe

Haxe

Open Source

Haxe is a versatile open-source programming language and compiler that lets developers write code once and deploy it across numerous platforms, including web (JavaScript, Node.js), mobile (iOS, Android), desktop (Windows, macOS, Linux), servers, and even game consoles.

Key Features

  • Develop for multiple platforms from a single codebase.
  • Strong static typing improves code reliability.
  • Powerful macro system for advanced code generation.

vs C#

Develop for multiple platforms from a single codebase. compared to C#
Objective-C

Objective-C

Open Source

Objective-C was a robust, general-purpose, object-oriented programming language primarily used for Apple's macOS and iOS operating systems. It combined C's power with Smalltalk's dynamic messaging capabilities.

Key Features

  • Excellent integration with macOS and iOS frameworks.
  • Powerful object-oriented features.
  • Seamless interoperability with C code.

vs C#

Excellent integration with macOS and iOS frameworks. compared to C#
Groovy

Groovy

Open Source

Apache Groovy is a powerful, optionally typed and dynamic language for the Java platform. It seamlessly integrates with existing Java code and libraries, making it a versatile tool for scripting, application development, testing, and automation.

Key Features

  • Seamless interoperability with Java.
  • More concise and expressive syntax than Java.
  • Supports both dynamic and static typing.

vs C#

Seamless interoperability with Java. compared to C#
Erlang

Erlang

Open Source

Erlang is a powerful functional programming language designed for building highly available, scalable, and fault-tolerant soft real-time systems. It excels in concurrent and distributed environments, making it ideal for applications requiring continuous uptime and handling vast amounts of concurrent requests.

Key Features

  • Excellent for building highly concurrent and distributed applications.
  • Superior fault tolerance and resilience built into the language.
  • Allows for high availability through hot code swapping.

vs C#

Excellent for building highly concurrent and distributed applications. compared to C#
Apple Swift

Apple Swift

Open Source

Swift is a powerful and intuitive compiled programming language from Apple, building on the best of C and Objective-C without the constraints of C compatibility. It's designed for safety, performance, and modern software design patterns, enabling developers to create apps for iOS, macOS, watchOS, tvOS, and beyond.

Key Features

  • Enhanced safety features reduce runtime errors.
  • Excellent performance due to compilation to native code.
  • Clean and expressive syntax improves readability and maintainability.

vs C#

Enhanced safety features reduce runtime errors. compared to C#
Clojure

Clojure

Open Source

Clojure is a dynamic, functional dialect of the Lisp programming language on the Java virtual machine (JVM). It emphasizes immutability and persistent data structures for robust concurrent programming.

Key Features

  • Excellent support for concurrent programming due to immutability and built-in features.
  • Runs on the JVM, providing access to a vast ecosystem of libraries and tools.
  • Powerful macro system allows for highly expressive and extensible code.

vs C#

Excellent support for concurrent programming due to immutability and built-in features. compared to C#
Free Pascal

Free Pascal

Open Source

Free Pascal Compiler (FPC) is a robust and versatile compiler for Pascal and Object Pascal, distributed under the GNU GPL. It supports numerous platforms and architectures, enabling developers to create a wide range of applications from console tools to cross-platform GUI applications.

Key Features

  • Excellent cross-platform compatibility.
  • Generates native, optimized code.
  • Free and open source under GNU GPL.

vs C#

Excellent cross-platform compatibility. compared to C#
FreeBASIC

FreeBASIC

Open Source

FreeBASIC is a free and open-source multiplatform BASIC compiler. It supports a wide range of operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS (via third-party ports), facilitating cross-platform development. It's designed to be highly compatible with QuickBASIC while offering numerous modern features like object-oriented programming, manual memory management, and support for graphics and sound libraries, making it suitable for various programming tasks from system utilities to game development.

Key Features

  • High compatibility with QuickBASIC.
  • Generates efficient native executables.
  • Supports modern programming paradigms.

vs C#

High compatibility with QuickBASIC. compared to C#
Jython

Jython

Open Source

Jython is a Python implementation designed to run on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM). It allows Python developers to leverage Java libraries and frameworks, and Java developers to integrate Python scripting into their applications, bridging the gap between the two ecosystems.

Key Features

  • Seamless integration with Java libraries and frameworks.
  • Allows embedding Python into Java applications.
  • Cross-platform compatibility due to running on the JVM.

vs C#

Seamless integration with Java libraries and frameworks. compared to C#
Tcl

Tcl

Open Source

Tcl (Tool Command Language) is a dynamic, high-level scripting language ideal for rapid application development, scripting, and automation, particularly strong in graphical user interfaces.

Key Features

  • Easy to learn and use, especially for scripting.
  • Integrated and powerful Tk toolkit for GUI development.
  • Excellent cross-platform compatibility.

vs C#

Easy to learn and use, especially for scripting. compared to C#
REBOL

REBOL

Free

REBOL is a lightweight, cross-platform language designed for data exchange, networking, and distributed computing. It's known for its expressive syntax and focus on dialects for various tasks, making it suitable for scripting and building domain-specific applications.

Key Features

  • Highly portable across various operating systems and architectures.
  • Expressive and concise syntax for rapid development.
  • Excellent for data parsing, manipulation, and exchange.

vs C#

Highly portable across various operating systems and architectures. compared to C#
Kotlin

Kotlin

Open Source

Kotlin is a modern, statically-typed programming language developed by JetBrains. It runs on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM), Android, and the web (via JavaScript), and can compile to native code. Designed for concise, safe, and interoperable code, Kotlin aims to make programming more enjoyable and productive.

Key Features

  • Enhanced safety with explicit null handling, reducing NullPointerException errors.
  • More concise and expressive syntax compared to Java, leading to faster development and improved readability.
  • Excellent interoperability with Java, allowing smooth integration into existing projects.

vs C#

Enhanced safety with explicit null handling, reducing NullPointerException errors. compared to C#
F# (programming language)

F# is an open-source, cross-platform, functional-first programming language designed for conciseness and correctness. It integrates seamlessly with the .NET ecosystem, making it ideal for data science, web development, and more.

Key Features

  • Concise and expressive syntax.
  • Strong static typing with excellent type inference.
  • Seamless integration with the .NET ecosystem and libraries.

vs C#

Concise and expressive syntax. compared to C#
Nim (programming language)

Nim is a modern, statically typed, compiled programming language emphasizing efficiency, expressiveness, and flexibility. It draws inspiration from languages like Python, Pascal, and C++, making it approachable for developers while offering low-level control for systems programming.

Key Features

  • Excellent performance due to compilation to native code.
  • Clean and expressive syntax enhances readability and productivity.
  • Strong static typing catches errors early.

vs C#

Excellent performance due to compilation to native code. compared to C#
Squirrel (programming language)

Squirrel is a high-level, imperative and object-oriented programming language designed for embedding in applications.

Key Features

  • Excellent for embedding in C++ applications with a clean API.
  • Lightweight and has a small memory footprint.
  • Generally good performance due to bytecode compilation.

vs C#

Excellent for embedding in C++ applications with a clean API. compared to C#

Compare Side-by-Side

Want to see how C# stacks up against alternatives? Select any option below for a detailed comparison.

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare