Clojure icon

Top Alternatives to Clojure

Looking for Clojure alternatives? We've curated 18 top alternatives that offer similar functionality. Whether you need options, free plans, or open source solutions, explore our comprehensive list to find the perfect fit for your needs.

Categories:
Platforms:
Python

Python

Open Source

Python is a versatile, high-level programming language renowned for its readability and simplicity. It supports multiple programming paradigms, including object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. It boasts a large and active community, extensive libraries, and is widely used for web development, data science, artificial intelligence, and scripting.

Key Features

  • Easy to learn and read.
  • Large and active community.
  • Extensive collection of libraries.

vs Clojure

Easy to learn and read. compared to Clojure
JavaScript

JavaScript

Open Source

JavaScript is a versatile, high-level programming language primarily used for creating dynamic and interactive web content. It runs directly in web browsers and is a fundamental technology alongside HTML and CSS.

Key Features

  • Runs natively in all web browsers.
  • Large and active community with extensive resources.
  • Vast ecosystem of libraries and frameworks.

vs Clojure

Runs natively in all web browsers. compared to Clojure
C++

C++

Open Source

C++ is a powerful, general-purpose programming language renowned for its performance and flexibility. It supports procedural, object-oriented, generic, and functional programming paradigms, making it suitable for a wide range of applications from system software to video games.

Key Features

  • Exceptional performance and efficiency due to low-level control.
  • Supports multiple programming paradigms for flexibility.
  • Comprehensive and highly optimized standard library.

vs Clojure

Exceptional performance and efficiency due to low-level control. compared to Clojure
Ruby

Ruby

Open Source

Ruby is a dynamic, open-source programming language known for its elegant syntax and focus on developer productivity. It's widely used for web development, scripting, and rapid prototyping.

Key Features

  • Elegant and readable syntax
  • High developer productivity
  • Strong ecosystem with RubyGems

vs Clojure

Elegant and readable syntax compared to Clojure
C#

C#

Open Source

C# is a versatile, modern, object-oriented programming language from Microsoft. It's widely used for developing Windows applications, web services, mobile apps, and games, offering a balance of power and ease of use.

Key Features

  • Strong object-oriented features.
  • Extensive and well-designed .NET class library.
  • Excellent tooling and IDE support (especially Visual Studio).

vs Clojure

Strong object-oriented features. compared to Clojure
Lua

Lua

Open Source

Lua is a powerful, fast, and lightweight scripting language designed for embedding in applications. It's known for its simplicity, portability, and efficiency, making it ideal for a wide range of uses from embedded systems to game development and configuration.

Key Features

  • Extremely lightweight and fast
  • Easy to embed into other applications
  • Simple and easy-to-learn syntax

vs Clojure

Extremely lightweight and fast compared to Clojure
Go (Programming Language)

Go (Golang) is an open-source, statically typed, compiled programming language designed at Google. Known for its concurrency primitives, garbage collection, and focus on simplicity, Go is well-suited for building scalable, high-performance applications, particularly in networking, cloud services, and microservices.

Key Features

  • Excellent concurrency support with goroutines and channels.
  • Fast compilation times lead to rapid development cycles.
  • Efficient garbage collection simplifies memory management.

vs Clojure

Excellent concurrency support with goroutines and channels. compared to Clojure
Scala

Scala

Open Source

Scala is a powerful, general-purpose programming language designed to combine the best features of object-oriented and functional programming paradigms.

Key Features

  • Excellent blend of object-oriented and functional programming.
  • Strong static type system catches errors early.
  • Seamless interoperability with Java and the JVM ecosystem.

vs Clojure

Excellent blend of object-oriented and functional programming. compared to Clojure
Rust

Rust

Open Source

Rust is a multi-paradigm, general-purpose programming language designed for performance and safety, especially safe concurrency. It's ideal for systems programming and performance-critical applications.

Key Features

  • Guaranteed memory safety without garbage collection.
  • Excellent performance, comparable to C/C++.
  • Fearless concurrency due to language design.

vs Clojure

Guaranteed memory safety without garbage collection. compared to Clojure
Haxe

Haxe

Open Source

Haxe is a versatile open-source programming language and compiler that lets developers write code once and deploy it across numerous platforms, including web (JavaScript, Node.js), mobile (iOS, Android), desktop (Windows, macOS, Linux), servers, and even game consoles.

Key Features

  • Develop for multiple platforms from a single codebase.
  • Strong static typing improves code reliability.
  • Powerful macro system for advanced code generation.

vs Clojure

Develop for multiple platforms from a single codebase. compared to Clojure
Objective-C

Objective-C

Open Source

Objective-C was a robust, general-purpose, object-oriented programming language primarily used for Apple's macOS and iOS operating systems. It combined C's power with Smalltalk's dynamic messaging capabilities.

Key Features

  • Excellent integration with macOS and iOS frameworks.
  • Powerful object-oriented features.
  • Seamless interoperability with C code.

vs Clojure

Excellent integration with macOS and iOS frameworks. compared to Clojure
Apple Swift

Apple Swift

Open Source

Swift is a powerful and intuitive compiled programming language from Apple, building on the best of C and Objective-C without the constraints of C compatibility. It's designed for safety, performance, and modern software design patterns, enabling developers to create apps for iOS, macOS, watchOS, tvOS, and beyond.

Key Features

  • Enhanced safety features reduce runtime errors.
  • Excellent performance due to compilation to native code.
  • Clean and expressive syntax improves readability and maintainability.

vs Clojure

Enhanced safety features reduce runtime errors. compared to Clojure
Jython

Jython

Open Source

Jython is a Python implementation designed to run on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM). It allows Python developers to leverage Java libraries and frameworks, and Java developers to integrate Python scripting into their applications, bridging the gap between the two ecosystems.

Key Features

  • Seamless integration with Java libraries and frameworks.
  • Allows embedding Python into Java applications.
  • Cross-platform compatibility due to running on the JVM.

vs Clojure

Seamless integration with Java libraries and frameworks. compared to Clojure
Tcl

Tcl

Open Source

Tcl (Tool Command Language) is a dynamic, high-level scripting language ideal for rapid application development, scripting, and automation, particularly strong in graphical user interfaces.

Key Features

  • Easy to learn and use, especially for scripting.
  • Integrated and powerful Tk toolkit for GUI development.
  • Excellent cross-platform compatibility.

vs Clojure

Easy to learn and use, especially for scripting. compared to Clojure
REBOL

REBOL

Free

REBOL is a lightweight, cross-platform language designed for data exchange, networking, and distributed computing. It's known for its expressive syntax and focus on dialects for various tasks, making it suitable for scripting and building domain-specific applications.

Key Features

  • Highly portable across various operating systems and architectures.
  • Expressive and concise syntax for rapid development.
  • Excellent for data parsing, manipulation, and exchange.

vs Clojure

Highly portable across various operating systems and architectures. compared to Clojure
Kotlin

Kotlin

Open Source

Kotlin is a modern, statically-typed programming language developed by JetBrains. It runs on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM), Android, and the web (via JavaScript), and can compile to native code. Designed for concise, safe, and interoperable code, Kotlin aims to make programming more enjoyable and productive.

Key Features

  • Enhanced safety with explicit null handling, reducing NullPointerException errors.
  • More concise and expressive syntax compared to Java, leading to faster development and improved readability.
  • Excellent interoperability with Java, allowing smooth integration into existing projects.

vs Clojure

Enhanced safety with explicit null handling, reducing NullPointerException errors. compared to Clojure
Nim (programming language)

Nim is a modern, statically typed, compiled programming language emphasizing efficiency, expressiveness, and flexibility. It draws inspiration from languages like Python, Pascal, and C++, making it approachable for developers while offering low-level control for systems programming.

Key Features

  • Excellent performance due to compilation to native code.
  • Clean and expressive syntax enhances readability and productivity.
  • Strong static typing catches errors early.

vs Clojure

Excellent performance due to compilation to native code. compared to Clojure
Squirrel (programming language)

Squirrel is a high-level, imperative and object-oriented programming language designed for embedding in applications.

Key Features

  • Excellent for embedding in C++ applications with a clean API.
  • Lightweight and has a small memory footprint.
  • Generally good performance due to bytecode compilation.

vs Clojure

Excellent for embedding in C++ applications with a clean API. compared to Clojure

Compare Side-by-Side

Want to see how Clojure stacks up against alternatives? Select any option below for a detailed comparison.

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare