Groovy icon

Top Alternatives to Groovy

Looking for Groovy alternatives? We've curated 19 top alternatives that offer similar functionality. Whether you need options, free plans, or open source solutions, explore our comprehensive list to find the perfect fit for your needs.

Categories:
Platforms:
Python

Python

Open Source

Python is a versatile, high-level programming language renowned for its readability and simplicity. It supports multiple programming paradigms, including object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles. It boasts a large and active community, extensive libraries, and is widely used for web development, data science, artificial intelligence, and scripting.

Key Features

  • Easy to learn and read.
  • Large and active community.
  • Extensive collection of libraries.

vs Groovy

Easy to learn and read. compared to Groovy
Java

Java

Free

Java is a widely-used, object-oriented, general-purpose programming language designed to have as few implementation dependencies as possible. Its core principle, "write once, run anywhere" (WORA), allows compiled Java code to run on any platform that supports Java without the need for recompilation.

Key Features

  • Platform Independent (Write Once, Run Anywhere)
  • Large and mature ecosystem with extensive libraries and frameworks
  • Automatic memory management (Garbage Collection)

vs Groovy

Platform Independent (Write Once, Run Anywhere) compared to Groovy
JavaScript

JavaScript

Open Source

JavaScript is a versatile, high-level programming language primarily used for creating dynamic and interactive web content. It runs directly in web browsers and is a fundamental technology alongside HTML and CSS.

Key Features

  • Runs natively in all web browsers.
  • Large and active community with extensive resources.
  • Vast ecosystem of libraries and frameworks.

vs Groovy

Runs natively in all web browsers. compared to Groovy
Ruby

Ruby

Open Source

Ruby is a dynamic, open-source programming language known for its elegant syntax and focus on developer productivity. It's widely used for web development, scripting, and rapid prototyping.

Key Features

  • Elegant and readable syntax
  • High developer productivity
  • Strong ecosystem with RubyGems

vs Groovy

Elegant and readable syntax compared to Groovy
C#

C#

Open Source

C# is a versatile, modern, object-oriented programming language from Microsoft. It's widely used for developing Windows applications, web services, mobile apps, and games, offering a balance of power and ease of use.

Key Features

  • Strong object-oriented features.
  • Extensive and well-designed .NET class library.
  • Excellent tooling and IDE support (especially Visual Studio).

vs Groovy

Strong object-oriented features. compared to Groovy
Lua

Lua

Open Source

Lua is a powerful, fast, and lightweight scripting language designed for embedding in applications. It's known for its simplicity, portability, and efficiency, making it ideal for a wide range of uses from embedded systems to game development and configuration.

Key Features

  • Extremely lightweight and fast
  • Easy to embed into other applications
  • Simple and easy-to-learn syntax

vs Groovy

Extremely lightweight and fast compared to Groovy
Dart

Dart

Open Source

Dart is an open-source, client-optimized programming language for building fast apps on any platform. It offers a productive development experience and high performance.

Key Features

  • Excellent for building cross-platform applications with Flutter.
  • Strong tooling and features like hot-reload boost developer productivity.
  • Flexible compilation to native code or JavaScript for performance and reach.

vs Groovy

Excellent for building cross-platform applications with Flutter. compared to Groovy
Scala

Scala

Open Source

Scala is a powerful, general-purpose programming language designed to combine the best features of object-oriented and functional programming paradigms.

Key Features

  • Excellent blend of object-oriented and functional programming.
  • Strong static type system catches errors early.
  • Seamless interoperability with Java and the JVM ecosystem.

vs Groovy

Excellent blend of object-oriented and functional programming. compared to Groovy
D (Programming Language)

D is a general-purpose systems and application programming language that aims to combine the power and high performance of C++ with the productivity and safety of modern languages like Python or Ruby.

Key Features

  • Excellent performance comparable to C/C++.
  • Strong safety features reduce common programming errors.
  • Modern language features enhance developer productivity.

vs Groovy

Excellent performance comparable to C/C++. compared to Groovy
Objective-C

Objective-C

Open Source

Objective-C was a robust, general-purpose, object-oriented programming language primarily used for Apple's macOS and iOS operating systems. It combined C's power with Smalltalk's dynamic messaging capabilities.

Key Features

  • Excellent integration with macOS and iOS frameworks.
  • Powerful object-oriented features.
  • Seamless interoperability with C code.

vs Groovy

Excellent integration with macOS and iOS frameworks. compared to Groovy
Apple Swift

Apple Swift

Open Source

Swift is a powerful and intuitive compiled programming language from Apple, building on the best of C and Objective-C without the constraints of C compatibility. It's designed for safety, performance, and modern software design patterns, enabling developers to create apps for iOS, macOS, watchOS, tvOS, and beyond.

Key Features

  • Enhanced safety features reduce runtime errors.
  • Excellent performance due to compilation to native code.
  • Clean and expressive syntax improves readability and maintainability.

vs Groovy

Enhanced safety features reduce runtime errors. compared to Groovy
jRuby

jRuby

Open Source

JRuby is a robust implementation of the Ruby programming language built on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM). It provides seamless interoperability between Ruby and Java, allowing developers to leverage the strengths of both ecosystems.

Key Features

  • Seamless interoperability with Java.
  • Access to the vast Java library ecosystem.
  • Benefits from JVM performance optimizations (JIT compilation, garbage collection).

vs Groovy

Seamless interoperability with Java. compared to Groovy
FreeBASIC

FreeBASIC

Open Source

FreeBASIC is a free and open-source multiplatform BASIC compiler. It supports a wide range of operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS (via third-party ports), facilitating cross-platform development. It's designed to be highly compatible with QuickBASIC while offering numerous modern features like object-oriented programming, manual memory management, and support for graphics and sound libraries, making it suitable for various programming tasks from system utilities to game development.

Key Features

  • High compatibility with QuickBASIC.
  • Generates efficient native executables.
  • Supports modern programming paradigms.

vs Groovy

High compatibility with QuickBASIC. compared to Groovy
Tcl

Tcl

Open Source

Tcl (Tool Command Language) is a dynamic, high-level scripting language ideal for rapid application development, scripting, and automation, particularly strong in graphical user interfaces.

Key Features

  • Easy to learn and use, especially for scripting.
  • Integrated and powerful Tk toolkit for GUI development.
  • Excellent cross-platform compatibility.

vs Groovy

Easy to learn and use, especially for scripting. compared to Groovy
REBOL

REBOL

Free

REBOL is a lightweight, cross-platform language designed for data exchange, networking, and distributed computing. It's known for its expressive syntax and focus on dialects for various tasks, making it suitable for scripting and building domain-specific applications.

Key Features

  • Highly portable across various operating systems and architectures.
  • Expressive and concise syntax for rapid development.
  • Excellent for data parsing, manipulation, and exchange.

vs Groovy

Highly portable across various operating systems and architectures. compared to Groovy
Kotlin

Kotlin

Open Source

Kotlin is a modern, statically-typed programming language developed by JetBrains. It runs on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM), Android, and the web (via JavaScript), and can compile to native code. Designed for concise, safe, and interoperable code, Kotlin aims to make programming more enjoyable and productive.

Key Features

  • Enhanced safety with explicit null handling, reducing NullPointerException errors.
  • More concise and expressive syntax compared to Java, leading to faster development and improved readability.
  • Excellent interoperability with Java, allowing smooth integration into existing projects.

vs Groovy

Enhanced safety with explicit null handling, reducing NullPointerException errors. compared to Groovy
F# (programming language)

F# is an open-source, cross-platform, functional-first programming language designed for conciseness and correctness. It integrates seamlessly with the .NET ecosystem, making it ideal for data science, web development, and more.

Key Features

  • Concise and expressive syntax.
  • Strong static typing with excellent type inference.
  • Seamless integration with the .NET ecosystem and libraries.

vs Groovy

Concise and expressive syntax. compared to Groovy
Nim (programming language)

Nim is a modern, statically typed, compiled programming language emphasizing efficiency, expressiveness, and flexibility. It draws inspiration from languages like Python, Pascal, and C++, making it approachable for developers while offering low-level control for systems programming.

Key Features

  • Excellent performance due to compilation to native code.
  • Clean and expressive syntax enhances readability and productivity.
  • Strong static typing catches errors early.

vs Groovy

Excellent performance due to compilation to native code. compared to Groovy
Squirrel (programming language)

Squirrel is a high-level, imperative and object-oriented programming language designed for embedding in applications.

Key Features

  • Excellent for embedding in C++ applications with a clean API.
  • Lightweight and has a small memory footprint.
  • Generally good performance due to bytecode compilation.

vs Groovy

Excellent for embedding in C++ applications with a clean API. compared to Groovy

Compare Side-by-Side

Want to see how Groovy stacks up against alternatives? Select any option below for a detailed comparison.

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare