IPFS icon

Top Alternatives to IPFS

Looking for IPFS alternatives? We've curated 21 top alternatives that offer similar functionality. Whether you need options, free plans, or open source solutions, explore our comprehensive list to find the perfect fit for your needs.

Open Source More about IPFS
Platforms:
SpiderOak

SpiderOak

Commercial

SpiderOak is a highly secure, zero-knowledge cloud backup, sync, and sharing platform designed to protect your data from ransomware, hardware failures, and other threats. It offers robust end-to-end encryption, ensuring only you can access your files.

Key Features

  • Exceptional data privacy due to zero-knowledge encryption.
  • Strong end-to-end encryption for all data.
  • Comprehensive features including backup, sync, and sharing.

vs IPFS

Exceptional data privacy due to zero-knowledge encryption. compared to IPFS
SugarSync

SugarSync

Commercial

SugarSync is a powerful cloud synchronization and backup service that allows users to sync any folder on their computer across multiple devices. It offers real-time syncing, file sharing, and robust security features to keep your data accessible and protected.

Key Features

  • Sync any folder on your computer.
  • Real-time synchronization across devices.
  • Robust version history for file recovery.

vs IPFS

Sync any folder on your computer. compared to IPFS
Resilio Sync

Resilio Sync

Freemium

Resilio Sync is a powerful and flexible peer-to-peer file synchronization and sharing solution designed for individuals, teams, and enterprises. It offers fast and reliable data transfer without relying on a central cloud server, providing enhanced privacy and control over your data.

Key Features

  • Very fast synchronization and transfers, especially for large files.
  • Enhanced privacy and security with end-to-end encryption and no central server.
  • Highly resilient due to distributed architecture.

vs IPFS

Very fast synchronization and transfers, especially for large files. compared to IPFS
I2P

I2P

Open Source

I2P (The Invisible Internet Project) is a secure, anonymous overlay network layer designed for privacy-preserving communication and application hosting. It enables users to browse anonymously, host websites (.i2p 'eepsites'), chat, and transfer files without revealing their identity or location.

Key Features

  • Strong anonymity provided by garlic routing and unidirectional tunnels.
  • Decentralized architecture ensures resilience and censorship resistance.
  • Excellent support for hosting and accessing anonymous services (.i2p eepsites).

vs IPFS

Strong anonymity provided by garlic routing and unidirectional tunnels. compared to IPFS
SyncToy

SyncToy

Free

SyncToy is a free file synchronization tool from Microsoft's PowerToys series, designed for Windows. It offers an intuitive graphical interface to help users synchronize files and folders between different locations on their computer or network drives. Ideal for simple backup and mirroring tasks.

Key Features

  • Free of charge
  • Easy to use graphical interface
  • Multiple synchronization methods

vs IPFS

Free of charge compared to IPFS
Freenet

Freenet

Open Source

Freenet is a robust, decentralized peer-to-peer platform designed to provide uncensored communication and information sharing. It leverages a distributed data store and a suite of free software applications to enable users to publish and access content anonymously, bypassing censorship and surveillance.

Key Features

  • Strong resistance to censorship due to decentralized and distributed architecture.
  • Provides a high degree of anonymity for both content publishers and consumers.
  • Data is difficult to remove once inserted into the network.

vs IPFS

Strong resistance to censorship due to decentralized and distributed architecture. compared to IPFS
SparkleShare

SparkleShare

Open Source

SparkleShare is a free and open-source file synchronization and sharing client that leverages Git for version control. It empowers users and teams to collaborate on projects and keep their files in sync effortlessly across multiple devices, prioritizing security and transparency.

Key Features

  • Strong version control with Git history
  • Open source and transparent
  • Optional client-side encryption for privacy

vs IPFS

Strong version control with Git history compared to IPFS
Pydio

Pydio

Free Personal

Pydio, a mature open-source platform formerly known as AjaXplorer, provides secure file-sharing and synchronization capabilities. Designed for self-hosting, it empowers organizations to maintain full control over their sensitive data, offering a robust and privacy-focused alternative to public cloud storage services.

Key Features

  • Self-hosted for complete data control and privacy.
  • Strong focus on security with features like client-side encryption and granular permissions.
  • Comprehensive file sharing and synchronization capabilities.

vs IPFS

Self-hosted for complete data control and privacy. compared to IPFS
Syncany

Syncany

Open Source

Syncany was a discontinued open-source file synchronization and backup application designed with a strong emphasis on security and privacy. It offered client-side encryption and allowed users to back up and sync data to various cloud storage providers or even their own servers.

Key Features

  • Strong emphasis on client-side encryption for enhanced privacy.
  • Supports a wide range of storage backends, offering flexibility.
  • Decentralized architecture provides more user control over data.

vs IPFS

Strong emphasis on client-side encryption for enhanced privacy. compared to IPFS
Unison

Unison

Open Source

Unison is a robust, open-source file synchronization tool for macOS, Unix, and Windows. It enables reliable bidirectional synchronization between two replicas of files and directories across different hosts or disks, ensuring both locations are kept up-to-date with changes.

Key Features

  • Excellent bidirectional synchronization capabilities.
  • Robust conflict detection and user-guided resolution.
  • Supports major operating systems (macOS, Unix, Windows).

vs IPFS

Excellent bidirectional synchronization capabilities. compared to IPFS
GNUnet

GNUnet

Open Source

GNUnet is a free and open-source framework for building secure, distributed, and privacy-preserving peer-to-peer applications. It goes beyond simple file sharing, offering a foundation for various decentralized services designed to resist surveillance and censorship.

Key Features

  • Strong focus on privacy and anonymity.
  • Decentralized architecture improves resilience.
  • Modular design supports various applications.

vs IPFS

Strong focus on privacy and anonymity. compared to IPFS
ZeroNet

ZeroNet

Open Source

ZeroNet is a decentralized, peer-to-peer network designed for building uncensored websites and applications. It leverages Bitcoin cryptography and BitTorrent technology to create a distributed platform where sites are hosted by visitors.

Key Features

  • Highly resistant to censorship
  • Lower operating costs compared to traditional hosting
  • Increased site resilience

vs IPFS

Highly resistant to censorship compared to IPFS
Ind.ie Pulse

Ind.ie Pulse

Open Source

Pulse is a free and secure decentralized file synchronization engine developed by Ind.ie. Designed with privacy and control in mind, it allows users to synchronize files and folders directly between devices without relying on central servers, promoting data ownership and resilience. While discontinued, it represents an important effort towards decentralized file management.

Key Features

  • Strong emphasis on data privacy and user control
  • Uses end-to-end encryption for secure synchronization
  • Decentralized architecture avoids reliance on central servers

vs IPFS

Strong emphasis on data privacy and user control compared to IPFS
Sandstorm.io

Sandstorm.io

Open Source

Sandstorm.io is a self-hostable platform designed to empower users to run web applications securely on their own servers while ensuring strong privacy and sandboxing for each application instance.

Key Features

  • Exceptional application security through sandboxing.
  • Full control and ownership of user data.
  • Simplified application installation and updates.

vs IPFS

Exceptional application security through sandboxing. compared to IPFS
SyncTrayzor

SyncTrayzor

Open Source

SyncTrayzor is a seamless and unobtrusive tray utility for Windows that integrates the powerful Syncthing file synchronization service into your system. It provides a familiar Windows application interface for managing your synchronized folders, monitoring activity, and configuring Syncthing, making decentralized file synchronization accessible and user-friendly.

Key Features

  • Provides a native Windows application experience for Syncthing.
  • Seamlessly integrates the Syncthing web interface.
  • Manages Syncthing background process effectively.

vs IPFS

Provides a native Windows application experience for Syncthing. compared to IPFS
Librevault

Librevault

Open Source

Librevault is an open-source, zero-knowledge peer-to-peer file synchronization tool emphasizing privacy and security. It allows users to sync files directly between their devices without reliance on a central cloud server, ensuring data remains under user control and is protected by end-to-end encryption.

Key Features

  • Strong emphasis on user privacy and data control.
  • Decentralized peer-to-peer architecture.
  • True end-to-end and zero-knowledge encryption.

vs IPFS

Strong emphasis on user privacy and data control. compared to IPFS
Freehold

Freehold

Open Source

Freehold is an open, secure, and lightweight platform for managing, syncing, and storing your files and data. It offers robust security features, including end-to-end encryption and encrypted backups, and supports various deployment options including self-hosting.

Key Features

  • Strong emphasis on security with end-to-end encryption and encrypted backups.
  • Flexible self-hosting option for maximum data control.
  • Supports file synchronization and versioning for data consistency.

vs IPFS

Strong emphasis on security with end-to-end encryption and encrypted backups. compared to IPFS
Tahoe-LAFS

Tahoe-LAFS

Open Source

Tahoe-LAFS is a free and open-source distributed storage system. It focuses on security, privacy, and fault tolerance by encrypting, encoding, and distributing your data across multiple nodes.

Key Features

  • Strong security with client-side encryption ensures data privacy.
  • High fault tolerance and data availability through erasure coding and distribution.
  • Decentralized architecture eliminates single points of control and failure.

vs IPFS

Strong security with client-side encryption ensures data privacy. compared to IPFS
Zaclys ownCloud provider

Zaclys ownCloud provider offers a robust, hosted ownCloud solution for secure cloud storage, file synchronization, and collaboration. It emphasizes privacy and control over your data, providing a feature set for individuals and organizations to manage files, calendars, and contacts securely online.

Key Features

  • Strong focus on data privacy and security.
  • Comprehensive set of features based on ownCloud.
  • Includes file sync, sharing, and collaboration tools.

vs IPFS

Strong focus on data privacy and security. compared to IPFS
Storj

Storj

Open Source

Storj offers decentralized, encrypted cloud storage, leveraging a network of independent storage nodes to provide higher security, privacy, and availability compared to traditional centralized providers. Users benefit from end-to-end encryption and pay-as-you-go pricing.

Key Features

  • Strong end-to-end encryption ensures data privacy.
  • Decentralized architecture enhances security and availability.
  • Pay-as-you-go pricing is flexible and cost-effective.

vs IPFS

Strong end-to-end encryption ensures data privacy. compared to IPFS
ZeroMe

ZeroMe

Open Source

ZeroMe is a decentralized, peer-to-peer social network powered by ZeroNet. It offers a censorship-resistant platform where users control their data and communication, featuring threaded conversations, private messaging, and an emphasis on free speech.

Key Features

  • High degree of censorship resistance.
  • Users maintain ownership and control of their data.
  • Enhanced user privacy and security.

vs IPFS

High degree of censorship resistance. compared to IPFS

Compare Side-by-Side

Want to see how IPFS stacks up against alternatives? Select any option below for a detailed comparison.

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare