Application Discontinued: NVU might have been discontinued. View alternatives

NVU icon

NVU

Nvu is a discontinued, open-source WYSIWYG HTML editor. Based on the Mozilla Application Suite's Composer component, it provided a simple visual interface for creating web pages without needing extensive coding knowledge. It was a popular choice for beginners and non-programmers for basic website creation.

Daniel Glazman

License

Open Source

Platforms

Mac OS X Windows Linux PortableApps.com Discontinued

About NVU

Nvu was a powerful yet user-friendly WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) HTML editor that allowed users to create web pages visually, much like using a word processor. Developed by Linspire under the leadership of Daniel Glazman, it was based on the Composer component from the Mozilla Application Suite, inheriting its rendering engine and a similar interface. This made it familiar to users of Mozilla products at the time.

The core philosophy behind Nvu was to make web development accessible to everyone, regardless of their technical expertise. Its intuitive visual editor allowed users to drag and drop elements, format text, and insert images directly onto a page, seeing the results instantly. This eliminated the Steep learning curve often associated with hand-coding HTML.

While primarily a visual editor, Nvu also provided access to the underlying HTML code for those who needed more control or wanted to fine-tune their pages. It included features like a built-in HTML validator to help ensure code compliance and basic CSS support for styling.

Key features of Nvu included:

  • WYSIWYG Editing: Create and edit web pages visually without writing a single line of code.
  • Integrated File Management: Manage local and remote files directly within the application.
  • Site Manager: Organize and publish entire websites.
  • HTML Validator: Check your HTML code for errors and compliance.
  • CSS Editor: Basic support for styling your web pages.

Despite its initial popularity and ease of use, development on Nvu ceased in 2006. However, its legacy continued with follow-up projects like KompoZer, which aimed to maintain and improve upon the Nvu codebase. While now discontinued and considered outdated compared to modern web development tools, Nvu played a significant role in democratizing web creation during its active development period, making it a notable piece of web development history.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Very easy to use for beginners with no coding experience.
  • WYSIWYG interface simplifies web page creation.
  • Integrated site management and FTP capabilities.
  • Completely free and open-source.

Cons

  • Discontinued development, making it outdated.
  • Limited support for modern web standards (HTML5, CSS3).
  • Can generate less optimized or semantically poor code.
  • Lacks advanced features of contemporary web development tools.

What Makes NVU Stand Out

Ease of Use for Beginners

Designed to be extremely user-friendly, making web page creation accessible to those with no coding experience.

WYSIWYG Focus

Strong emphasis on visual editing provides an immediate and intuitive way to build web pages.

Completely Free

Available at no cost, making it an attractive option for individual users and non-profits.

Features & Capabilities

9 features

Expert Review

NVU Software Review

Nvu was a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) HTML editor that aimed to simplify the process of web page creation. Based on the Composer component of the Mozilla Application Suite, it inherited a familiar interface and a relatively robust rendering engine for its time. The primary appeal of Nvu lay in its user-friendliness. For individuals who wanted to build simple websites without delving into the complexities of HTML and CSS code, Nvu provided a visual environment where elements could be dragged, dropped, and formatted much like in a word processing application.

The interface was straightforward, typically featuring a main editing window displaying the web page as it would appear in a browser, alongside toolbars with common formatting and insertion options. Users could easily add text, images, links, and tables through intuitive menus and buttons. A split view was also available, allowing users to see the visual representation and the underlying HTML code simultaneously, which was helpful for those who wanted to learn or make minor code adjustments.

One of Nvu's strengths was its integrated site manager. This feature allowed users to organize their web pages, manage files (both local and remote via FTP), and publish their entire website directly from within the application. This consolidation of tasks streamlined the workflow for basic website projects.

However, Nvu had limitations, particularly as web development standards evolved and the demand for dynamic and complex websites grew. Its support for modern web technologies like CSS layouts, JavaScript frameworks, and responsive design was limited or non-existent. While it offered basic CSS editing, it lacked the advanced features and real-time preview capabilities found in later editors. The underlying rendering engine, while functional, could sometimes produce code that was semantically less clean compared to hand-coded pages or outputs from more sophisticated editors.

Furthermore, the development of Nvu ceased in 2006, meaning it did not receive updates to keep pace with changes in web standards or browser compatibility. This eventual discontinuation led to it becoming increasingly outdated and less reliable for creating websites that would function consistently across modern browsers and devices. While follow-up projects like KompoZer emerged to continue Nvu's legacy, the original Nvu itself is no longer a viable tool for contemporary web development.

In summary, Nvu was a pioneering tool for its time, successfully lowering the barrier to entry for web creation through its WYSIWYG approach. It was well-suited for creating simple, static websites for personal use or small projects. Its ease of use and integrated features made it a popular choice for beginners. However, its lack of updates and limited support for modern web technologies mean it is no longer recommended for current web development tasks.

Screenshots

Similar Apps

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare