123D vs Gmsh

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

123D icon

123D

Autodesk 123D was a discontinued suite of free, user-friendly 3D design software designed for hobbyists, students, and small-scale fabrication enthusiasts. It offered tools for 3D modeling, sculpting, photogrammetry, and preparing designs for 3D printing and láser cutting. by Autodesk, Inc.

Free Personal
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows iPad
Screenshots:
VS
Gmsh icon

Gmsh

Gmsh is a versatile open-source 3D finite element mesh generator with a built-in CAD engine and post-processor. It is designed for efficient grid generation for numerical simulations across various engineering and scientific disciplines.

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

123D and Gmsh are both powerful solutions in their space. 123D offers autodesk 123d was a discontinued suite of free, user-friendly 3d design software designed for hobbyists, students, and small-scale fabrication enthusiasts. it offered tools for 3d modeling, sculpting, photogrammetry, and preparing designs for 3d printing and láser cutting., while Gmsh provides gmsh is a versatile open-source 3d finite element mesh generator with a built-in cad engine and post-processor. it is designed for efficient grid generation for numerical simulations across various engineering and scientific disciplines.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

123D

123D

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

User-friendly interface suitable for beginners
Accessible entry point to 3D design and fabrication
Suite offered tools for different workflows (modeling, sculpting, photogrammetry)
Good for preparing models for 3D printing and laser cutting

Limitations

Discontinued with no further updates or support
Less powerful and feature-rich than professional CAD software
Can be limiting for complex design tasks
Gmsh

Gmsh

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Free and open-source software
Integrated CAD, meshing, and post-processing
Powerful scripting for automation and parametric studies
Supports a wide range of meshing algorithms
Active user community and good documentation

Limitations

Requires external solvers for full simulation workflow
User interface can have a learning curve, especially for scripting
Post-processing capabilities are not as advanced as dedicated visualization software

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare