aTube Catcher vs streamWriter Comparison

Compare features to find which solution is best for your needs.

aTube Catcher icon

aTube Catcher

aTube Catcher is a comprehensive multimedia suite offering video downloading, conversion, and recording capabilities from various sources. It's a versatile tool for managing online video content and recording your desktop activity. by DsNET Corp (Diego Uscanga)

Free
Categories:
Available for:
Windows
VS
streamWriter icon

streamWriter

streamWriter is a free Windows application designed for recording music broadcasted by various internet radio stations. It allows users to capture their favorite online radio streams and save them to the computer for offline listening. by Alexander Nottelmann

Open Source
Categories:
Available for:
Windows

Summary

aTube Catcher and streamWriter are both powerful solutions in their space. aTube Catcher offers atube catcher is a comprehensive multimedia suite offering video downloading, conversion, and recording capabilities from various sources. it's a versatile tool for managing online video content and recording your desktop activity., while streamWriter provides streamwriter is a free windows application designed for recording music broadcasted by various internet radio stations. it allows users to capture their favorite online radio streams and save them to the computer for offline listening.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

aTube Catcher

aTube Catcher

Pros

  • Supports downloading from a large number of websites.
  • Comprehensive video and audio conversion options.
  • Includes screen recording functionality.
  • Ability to burn to DVD and Blu-ray.
  • Batch processing for downloads and conversions.

Cons

  • User interface feels dated.
  • Presence of bundled software during installation.
  • Music downloader feature may have limitations.
  • Occasional stability issues reported.
streamWriter

streamWriter

Pros

  • Free to use with no limitations.
  • Automatic song splitting and ID3 tagging saves significant time.
  • Wishlist and scheduling features enable passive recording.
  • Can record multiple streams simultaneously.
  • Portable version available.

Cons

  • Relies on stream metadata for automatic features, which can be inconsistent.
  • User interface is functional but not modern or highly intuitive for beginners.
  • Exclusively for Windows.

Compare With Others

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare