Bacula vs CrashPlan Comparison

Compare features to find which solution is best for your needs.

Bacula icon

Bacula

Bacula is a robust, open-source backup and recovery software suite designed for enterprise environments. It offers a comprehensive solution for protecting data across heterogeneous networks, supporting various operating systems and storage devices.

Open Source
Categories:
Available for:
Mac OS X Windows Linux
VS
CrashPlan icon

CrashPlan

CrashPlan provides comprehensive and secure backup solutions for individuals, businesses, and enterprises, offering flexible options including offsite, onsite, and cloud-based storage to ensure data protection and recovery. by Code42

Freemium
Categories:
Available for:
Mac OS X Windows Linux Online Android iPhone iPad

Summary

Bacula and CrashPlan are both powerful solutions in their space. Bacula offers bacula is a robust, open-source backup and recovery software suite designed for enterprise environments. it offers a comprehensive solution for protecting data across heterogeneous networks, supporting various operating systems and storage devices., while CrashPlan provides crashplan provides comprehensive and secure backup solutions for individuals, businesses, and enterprises, offering flexible options including offsite, onsite, and cloud-based storage to ensure data protection and recovery.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Bacula

Bacula

Pros

  • Powerful and scalable for enterprise environments.
  • Open-source with no licensing costs.
  • Highly flexible and customizable configuration.
  • Supports heterogeneous networks and diverse storage.
  • Strong encryption features for data security.

Cons

  • Steep learning curve and complex configuration.
  • Requires technical expertise for effective management.
  • Recovery process can be less intuitive than some alternatives.
  • Support primarily relies on the community.
CrashPlan

CrashPlan

Pros

  • Flexible backup destinations (cloud, local, network, peer-to-peer).
  • Strong AES 256-bit encryption with user-managed key option.
  • Automatic and continuous background backups.
  • File versioning for point-in-time restore.
  • Unlimited storage on certain plans.

Cons

  • Initial setup can feel complex for some users.
  • Pricing can be a factor for larger deployments.
  • Initial backup of large datasets can be time-consuming.

Compare With Others

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare