Baïkal vs SOGo

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Baïkal

Baïkal is a lightweight and easy-to-use CalDAV and CardDAV server, providing a simple way to sync your calendars and contacts across various devices and applications. Built upon the robust sabre/dav library, it offers a straightforward administrative interface for seamless management of users and data. by Jérôme Schneider

Open Source

Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux Online Android iPhone Android Tablet BSD Windows Phone iPad MySQL Community Edition Self-Hosted NGINX Apache HTTP Server PHP SQLite

Screenshots:

Alternatives Details Website

SOGo

SOGo is a powerful open-source groupware server designed for scalability and simplicity. It provides a comprehensive suite of collaborative features including webmail, calendaring, contact management, and task management, with strong support for standard protocols like CalDAV and CardDAV. by inverse

Open Source

Platforms: Linux Online Thunderbird Cloudron

Alternatives Details Website

Comparison Summary

Baïkal and SOGo are both powerful solutions in their space. Baïkal offers baïkal is a lightweight and easy-to-use caldav and carddav server, providing a simple way to sync your calendars and contacts across various devices and applications. built upon the robust sabre/dav library, it offers a straightforward administrative interface for seamless management of users and data., while SOGo provides sogo is a powerful open-source groupware server designed for scalability and simplicity. it provides a comprehensive suite of collaborative features including webmail, calendaring, contact management, and task management, with strong support for standard protocols like caldav and carddav.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Baïkal

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Easy to install and configure.

Lightweight with minimal resource requirements.

Provides full control over personal data.

Supports a wide range of CalDAV and CardDAV clients.

Simple and intuitive administrative interface.

Limitations

Limited feature set compared to full groupware suites.

Requires some technical knowledge to set up and maintain a server environment.

Relies on external clients for user interaction beyond administration.

SOGo

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Open-source with no per-user licensing costs.

Strong support for CalDAV, CardDAV, and IMAP for broad client compatibility.

Comprehensive webmail, calendar, and contact management features.

Scalable architecture.

Self-hostable, offering control over data.

Limitations

Requires technical expertise for installation and maintenance.

Task management is functional but not as feature-rich as dedicated solutions.

Lacks advanced real-time collaboration features like document co-editing or integrated chat.

Dependency on external infrastructure components like databases and MTAs.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

No comparisons available at the moment