Bazaar vs Apache Subversion : Which is Better?
Bazaar
Bazaar is a version control system that helps you track project history over time and to collaborate easily with others. Developed by Canonical Ltd.
License: Open Source
VS
VS
Bazaar VS Apache Subversion
Apache Subversion is a centralized version control system that excels in handling large repositories and binary files but has a steeper learning curve and less flexibility in branching. In contrast, Bazaar is a distributed version control system that offers a more user-friendly experience, offline capabilities, and strong branching features, making it better suited for smaller projects or teams that value flexibility.
Bazaar
Pros:
- User-friendly interface for beginners
- Strong branching and merging capabilities
- Supports offline work effectively
- Has a flexible and adaptable architecture
- Strong community support and documentation
Cons:
- Performance issues with very large repositories
- Less suitable for enterprise environments
- May not be as widely adopted as alternatives
- Complexity in transitioning from centralized systems
- Limited features for locking files compared to Subversion
Apache Subversion
Pros:
- Strong support for large binary files
- Robust performance with large repositories
- File locking mechanism for binary files
- Widespread adoption in enterprise environments
- Good integration with existing tools and systems
Cons:
- Steeper learning curve for new users
- Less flexible branching and merging than some alternatives
- Centralized model can be a limitation for distributed teams
- Limited offline capabilities
- More complex setup compared to some distributed systems
Compare Bazaar
Compare Mercurial SCM and Bazaar and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Git for Windows and Bazaar and decide which is most suitable for you.
