Budgie vs LXQt

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Budgie icon

Budgie

Budgie is a modern and dynamic desktop environment designed for users seeking a balance of elegance and performance. It emphasizes a clean interface and a highly customizable experience, built with modern technologies. by Solus Project

Open Source
Platforms: Linux
Screenshots:
VS
LXQt icon

LXQt

LXQt is a free and open-source lightweight desktop environment for Linux and BSD systems, designed for speed, efficiency, and customization. It is built from the foundation of LXDE and Razor-qt, combining the best of both worlds to provide a modern yet resource-friendly user experience.

Open Source
Platforms: Linux BSD
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Budgie and LXQt are both powerful solutions in their space. Budgie offers budgie is a modern and dynamic desktop environment designed for users seeking a balance of elegance and performance. it emphasizes a clean interface and a highly customizable experience, built with modern technologies., while LXQt provides lxqt is a free and open-source lightweight desktop environment for linux and bsd systems, designed for speed, efficiency, and customization. it is built from the foundation of lxde and razor-qt, combining the best of both worlds to provide a modern yet resource-friendly user experience.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Budgie

Budgie

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Clean and modern aesthetic
Intuitive user interface
Good performance and resource usage
Useful Raven sidebar for notifications and controls
Decent customization options

Limitations

Less extensive customization than some competitors
Smaller third-party extension ecosystem
Dependency on the GNOME stack
LXQt

LXQt

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely lightweight and resource-efficient
Highly customizable through modular design
Fast and responsive performance
Modern look and feel despite resource efficiency
Suitable for older or low-end hardware

Limitations

May require more configuration compared to heavier environments
Out-of-the-box feature set might be more basic for some needs
Community support and documentation less extensive than GNOME or KDE

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare