Caddy vs lighttpd : Which is Better?
Caddy
Caddy is an HTTP/2 web server with automatic HTTPS. Developed by Matt Holt
License: Open Source
VS
VS
Caddy VS lighttpd
Caddy is known for its ease of use and automatic HTTPS, making it ideal for developers seeking quick deployment. In contrast, Lighttpd is optimized for high performance and lower resource usage, making it suitable for environments where efficiency is paramount.
Caddy
Pros:
- Easy to configure with automatic HTTPS
- Built-in support for reverse proxying and load balancing
- Simple and user-friendly configuration file
- Supports HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 out of the box
- Extensible with plugins for additional functionality
Cons:
- Limited features compared to some other web servers
- Less mature in terms of community support and available modules
- May not have as many performance tuning options for advanced users
lighttpd
Pros:
- High performance with low resource consumption
- Excellent support for FastCGI and SCGI
- Highly configurable with extensive module support
- Mature and stable with a long history
- Good for serving static content efficiently
Cons:
- Configuration can be complex for beginners
- Limited built-in support for modern protocols like HTTP/3
- Less user-friendly compared to some alternatives
Compare Caddy
Compare Abyss Webserver and Caddy and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Apache HTTP Server and Caddy and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Microsoft IIS and Caddy and decide which is most suitable for you.
