Charles vs mitmproxy

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Charles

Charles is a comprehensive HTTP proxy, monitor, and reverse proxy that allows developers to inspect, debug, and modify network traffic. It provides a graphical user interface to view all HTTP and SSL/HTTPS requests and responses, aiding in the development and testing of web applications and APIs. by Karl von Randow

Commercial

Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux

Screenshots:

Alternatives Details Website

mitmproxy

mitmproxy is a powerful, interactive HTTPS proxy that allows developers and security professionals to intercept, inspect, modify, and replay web traffic.

Open Source

Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux

Screenshots:

Alternatives Details Website

Comparison Summary

Charles and mitmproxy are both powerful solutions in their space. Charles offers charles is a comprehensive http proxy, monitor, and reverse proxy that allows developers to inspect, debug, and modify network traffic. it provides a graphical user interface to view all http and ssl/https requests and responses, aiding in the development and testing of web applications and apis., while mitmproxy provides mitmproxy is a powerful, interactive https proxy that allows developers and security professionals to intercept, inspect, modify, and replay web traffic.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Charles

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Detailed and clear visualization of HTTP/SSL traffic.

Powerful debugging features like Breakpoints and Rewrite.

Excellent support for debugging mobile device traffic.

Comprehensive set of tools for network analysis.

Reliable and stable performance.

Limitations

User interface can feel somewhat dated.

Initial learning curve for advanced features.

Licensing can be a bit expensive for individuals.

mitmproxy

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Powerful and flexible traffic manipulation capabilities.

Excellent SSL/TLS decryption for HTTPS visibility.

Highly extensible with Python scripting.

Efficient terminal interface for experienced users.

Open source and free to use.

Limitations

Terminal interface has a learning curve.

SSL/TLS setup can sometimes be challenging depending on the environment.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Fiddler vs Charles

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Zed Attack Proxy vs Charles

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare