Cinnamon vs LXQt

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Cinnamon icon

Cinnamon

Cinnamon is a free and open-source desktop environment for Linux and other Unix-like operating systems. Developed by the Linux Mint community, it provides a traditional yet modern user interface, blending familiarity with modern design elements for an intuitive desktop experience. by Linux Mint Team

Open Source
Platforms: Linux BSD
Screenshots:
VS
LXQt icon

LXQt

LXQt is a free and open-source lightweight desktop environment for Linux and BSD systems, designed for speed, efficiency, and customization. It is built from the foundation of LXDE and Razor-qt, combining the best of both worlds to provide a modern yet resource-friendly user experience.

Open Source
Platforms: Linux BSD
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Cinnamon and LXQt are both powerful solutions in their space. Cinnamon offers cinnamon is a free and open-source desktop environment for linux and other unix-like operating systems. developed by the linux mint community, it provides a traditional yet modern user interface, blending familiarity with modern design elements for an intuitive desktop experience., while LXQt provides lxqt is a free and open-source lightweight desktop environment for linux and bsd systems, designed for speed, efficiency, and customization. it is built from the foundation of lxde and razor-qt, combining the best of both worlds to provide a modern yet resource-friendly user experience.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Cinnamon

Cinnamon

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Familiar and traditional interface
High degree of customization
Relatively lightweight and performant
Stable and reliable

Limitations

Less innovative than some newer desktop environments
Limited native Wayland support currently
LXQt

LXQt

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely lightweight and resource-efficient
Highly customizable through modular design
Fast and responsive performance
Modern look and feel despite resource efficiency
Suitable for older or low-end hardware

Limitations

May require more configuration compared to heavier environments
Out-of-the-box feature set might be more basic for some needs
Community support and documentation less extensive than GNOME or KDE

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare