Citymapper vs OsmAnd : Which is Better?

Citymapper icon

Citymapper

Citymapper is a journey planning service and mobile app which covers specific large cities in Europe, North America and other countries. Developed by Citymapper Limited

License: Free

Categories: Travel & Location

Apps available for Online Android iPhone Android Tablet Apple Watch

VS
VS
OsmAnd icon

OsmAnd

OsmAnd (OpenStreetMap Automated Navigation Directions) is an open source map and navigation app Android and iOS. Developed by OsmAnd team

License: Freemium

Apps available for Android iPhone Blackberry Android Tablet iPad

Citymapper VS OsmAnd

OsmAnd is best suited for users who need offline maps and outdoor navigation, making it ideal for activities like hiking and cycling. In contrast, Citymapper excels in urban public transport navigation, offering real-time updates and features tailored for commuters.

Citymapper

Pros:

  • Best for urban public transport navigation
  • Real-time updates for public transport schedules
  • User-friendly interface
  • Comprehensive coverage of transportation modes
  • Route sharing feature for easy collaboration
  • Integration with local services like ride-sharing
  • Detailed information on public transport options
  • Good for commuters
  • Frequent updates with new features
  • Supports multi-modal transportation planning

Cons:

  • Dependent on mobile data for full functionality
  • Less suitable for outdoor navigation
  • Limited offline capabilities
  • Not ideal for long-distance route planning
  • May lack some customization options
  • Not as feature-rich for non-urban areas
  • Mainly focused on public transport, which may not suit everyone
  • Limited community features
  • Subscription model may not appeal to all users
  • Less support for cycling and walking compared to OsmAnd

OsmAnd

Pros:

  • Excellent offline map capabilities
  • Great for outdoor activities like hiking and cycling
  • Highly customizable routing options
  • User-generated content and POI updates
  • Supports multiple languages
  • Cost-effective with a one-time purchase
  • Rich map features including contour lines and elevation profiles
  • Strong community support
  • Good for long-distance route planning
  • Traffic information available for driving routes

Cons:

  • Less effective for urban public transport navigation
  • Steeper learning curve for new users
  • Limited access to real-time public transport data
  • Not as visually appealing as some competitors
  • Requires manual updates for offline maps
  • Occasional issues with map accuracy in urban areas
  • Less social features compared to Citymapper
  • No route sharing capabilities
  • Less focus on real-time traffic updates
  • Limited integration with local services

Compare Citymapper

vs
Compare Apple Maps and Citymapper and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Google Maps and Citymapper and decide which is most suitable for you.