Cool Retro Term vs Sakura

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Cool Retro Term icon

Cool Retro Term

Cool Retro Term is a terminal emulator designed to replicate the look and feel of classic cathode ray tube monitors. It offers extensive customization options to achieve a nostalgic aesthetic while functioning as a modern terminal. by Filippo Scognamiglio

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Linux
Screenshots:
VS
Sakura icon

Sakura

Sakura is a minimalist and lightweight terminal emulator built on GTK and libvte. It provides essential terminal functionalities with a focus on performance and simplicity, making it a solid choice for users who value a clean and efficient command-line experience on Linux systems. by [email protected]

Open Source
Platforms: Linux BSD
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Cool Retro Term and Sakura are both powerful solutions in their space. Cool Retro Term offers cool retro term is a terminal emulator designed to replicate the look and feel of classic cathode ray tube monitors. it offers extensive customization options to achieve a nostalgic aesthetic while functioning as a modern terminal., while Sakura provides sakura is a minimalist and lightweight terminal emulator built on gtk and libvte. it provides essential terminal functionalities with a focus on performance and simplicity, making it a solid choice for users who value a clean and efficient command-line experience on linux systems.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Cool Retro Term

Cool Retro Term

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Highly customizable retro visual effects
Authentic emulation of CRT monitors
GPU acceleration ensures smooth performance
Supports multi-session and split-screen views
Offers a unique and engaging user interface

Limitations

Retro effects may not appeal to all users
Configuration can be extensive for detailed customization
Sakura

Sakura

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely lightweight and fast.
Clean and minimalist user interface.
Excellent input responsiveness.
Stable and reliable performance.

Limitations

Lacks advanced features like built-in tabs or split-panes.
Limited customization options compared to some competitors.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare