CrashPlan vs Bacula

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

CrashPlan icon

CrashPlan

CrashPlan provides comprehensive and secure backup solutions for individuals, businesses, and enterprises, offering flexible options including offsite, onsite, and cloud-based storage to ensure data protection and recovery. by Code42

Freemium
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux Online Android iPhone iPad
Screenshots:
VS
Bacula icon

Bacula

Bacula is a robust, open-source backup and recovery software suite designed for enterprise environments. It offers a comprehensive solution for protecting data across heterogeneous networks, supporting various operating systems and storage devices.

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

CrashPlan and Bacula are both powerful solutions in their space. CrashPlan offers crashplan provides comprehensive and secure backup solutions for individuals, businesses, and enterprises, offering flexible options including offsite, onsite, and cloud-based storage to ensure data protection and recovery., while Bacula provides bacula is a robust, open-source backup and recovery software suite designed for enterprise environments. it offers a comprehensive solution for protecting data across heterogeneous networks, supporting various operating systems and storage devices.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

CrashPlan

CrashPlan

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Flexible backup destinations (cloud, local, network, peer-to-peer).
Strong AES 256-bit encryption with user-managed key option.
Automatic and continuous background backups.
File versioning for point-in-time restore.
Unlimited storage on certain plans.

Limitations

Initial setup can feel complex for some users.
Pricing can be a factor for larger deployments.
Initial backup of large datasets can be time-consuming.
Bacula

Bacula

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Powerful and scalable for enterprise environments.
Open-source with no licensing costs.
Highly flexible and customizable configuration.
Supports heterogeneous networks and diverse storage.
Strong encryption features for data security.

Limitations

Steep learning curve and complex configuration.
Requires technical expertise for effective management.
Recovery process can be less intuitive than some alternatives.
Support primarily relies on the community.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare