Deezer vs Funkwhale Comparison

Compare features to find which solution is best for your needs.

Deezer icon

Deezer

Deezer is a global music streaming service offering a vast library of tracks, podcasts, and radio channels. It provides a personalized listening experience with features like flow, lyrics synchronized with music, and offline playback for subscribers. by Deezer

Freemium
Categories:
Available for:
Online Android iPhone Java Mobile Blackberry Windows RT Windows Phone iPad Kindle Fire
VS
Funkwhale icon

Funkwhale

Funkwhale is a free and open-source, self-hostable platform for sharing music. It's a decentralized, community-oriented alternative to commercial music streaming services, built on ActivityPub for federation and offering features like music streaming, library management, playlists, and podcast support.

Open Source
Categories:
Available for:
Linux Web Self-Hosted

Summary

Deezer and Funkwhale are both powerful solutions in their space. Deezer offers deezer is a global music streaming service offering a vast library of tracks, podcasts, and radio channels. it provides a personalized listening experience with features like flow, lyrics synchronized with music, and offline playback for subscribers., while Funkwhale provides funkwhale is a free and open-source, self-hostable platform for sharing music. it's a decentralized, community-oriented alternative to commercial music streaming services, built on activitypub for federation and offering features like music streaming, library management, playlists, and podcast support.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Deezer

Deezer

Pros

  • Large music library
  • Effective personalized recommendations with 'Flow'
  • Synchronized lyrics feature
  • Offline listening for subscribers
  • Availability of podcasts and internet radio

Cons

  • User interface can feel less modern compared to competitors
  • Podcast discovery could be improved
Funkwhale

Funkwhale

Pros

  • Decentralized architecture provides resilience and user control.
  • Self-hostable, giving full ownership of your data and instance.
  • Ad-free listening experience.
  • Community-driven music discovery through federation.
  • Supports a wide range of audio formats for your library.
  • Includes a basic podcast player.

Cons

  • Requires technical knowledge for self-hosting.
  • May lack some advanced features found in commercial streaming services.
  • Music discovery for mainstream commercial artists can be less direct.
  • The size and content variety of the federated network depends on active pods.

Compare With Others

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare