Diagramo vs Dia Comparison

Compare features to find which solution is best for your needs.

Diagramo

Diagramo is a robust, open-source web-based diagramming tool perfect for creating flowcharts, graphs, and various diagrams directly in your browser. Built on HTML5, it offers real-time collaboration and flexible export options, making it accessible and versatile. by Diagramo

Open Source

Categories:

Available for:

Online

Alternatives Details Website

Dia

Dia is a free and open-source diagramming software suitable for creating a variety of diagrams including flowcharts, UML diagrams, and network layouts.

Open Source

Categories:

Available for:

Mac OS X Windows Linux PortableApps.com FreeBSD Xfce DragonFly BSD NetBSD OpenBSD Discontinued

Alternatives Details Website

Summary

Diagramo and Dia are both powerful solutions in their space. Diagramo offers diagramo is a robust, open-source web-based diagramming tool perfect for creating flowcharts, graphs, and various diagrams directly in your browser. built on html5, it offers real-time collaboration and flexible export options, making it accessible and versatile., while Dia provides dia is a free and open-source diagramming software suitable for creating a variety of diagrams including flowcharts, uml diagrams, and network layouts.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Diagramo

Pros

Free and open source
Web-based, no installation required
Real-time collaboration available
Supports various diagram types
Multiple export formats (PNG, PDF, SVG)

Cons

Shape library may be less extensive than commercial tools
Interface design could be more modern
Advanced formatting options are somewhat limited
Documentation and community support can vary

Dia

Pros

Completely free and open source.
Supports a wide variety of diagram types.
Extensive library of predefined shapes.
Allows creation of custom shapes.
Multiple export formats available.

Cons

Development has largely ceased (discontinued).
User interface is somewhat dated.
Lacks advanced features found in commercial alternatives (e.g., robust collaboration).
Documentation and community support may be less active.