EagleGet vs axel : Which is Better?
EagleGet
EagleGet is a universal download accelerator that supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, MMS and RTSP protocols. Developed by EagleGet
License: Free
axel
Axel tries to accelerate HTTP/FTP downloading process by using multiple connections for one file. It can use multiple mirrors for a download. Axel has no dependencies and is lightweight, so it might be useful as a wget clone on byte-critical systems. Developed by http://wilmer.gaa.st/main.php/axel.html
License: Open Source
EagleGet VS axel
EagleGet offers a user-friendly interface with various features aimed at general users, including browser integration and a built-in converter. In contrast, axel is a lightweight command-line tool geared towards advanced users who prioritize speed and efficiency over graphical interface, making it suitable for scripting and automation.
EagleGet
Pros:
- User-friendly interface
- Supports multiple protocols (HTTP, HTTPS, FTP)
- Multi-threaded download technology for faster downloads
- Integration with popular browsers like Chrome and Firefox
- Batch downloading capability
- Option to schedule downloads
- Support for video and audio streaming downloads
- Built-in video converter
- Automatic file renaming
- Lightweight and consumes fewer system resources
Cons:
- Limited advanced features compared to some competitors
- Occasional bugs in the software
- No native support for Linux
axel
Pros:
- Lightweight and fast download speeds
- Command-line interface for advanced users
- Supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, and BitTorrent protocols
- Ability to resume interrupted downloads
- Simple to integrate with other command-line tools
- Cross-platform support (Linux, Windows, macOS)
- No graphical interface means lower resource consumption
- Highly configurable with command-line options
- Good documentation for advanced users
- Free and open-source
Cons:
- Less user-friendly for non-technical users
- No built-in browser integration
- Limited features compared to GUI-based download managers
Compare EagleGet
