Epic Browser vs Dillo Comparison

Compare features to find which solution is best for your needs.

Epic Browser icon

Epic Browser

Epic Browser is a privacy-focused web browser built on the Chromium source code, designed to shield users from online tracking and threats through integrated privacy tools like a built-in ad blocker, tracker blocker, and encrypted proxy. by Hidden Reflex

Free
Categories:
Available for:
Mac OS X Windows
VS
Dillo icon

Dillo

Dillo is an exceptionally lightweight and fast web browser designed for resource-constrained systems. It prioritizes speed and efficiency, making it ideal for older computers, embedded devices, or users seeking fundamental web browsing without modern complexities.

Open Source
Categories:
Available for:
Mac OS X Linux Xfce

Summary

Epic Browser and Dillo are both powerful solutions in their space. Epic Browser offers epic browser is a privacy-focused web browser built on the chromium source code, designed to shield users from online tracking and threats through integrated privacy tools like a built-in ad blocker, tracker blocker, and encrypted proxy., while Dillo provides dillo is an exceptionally lightweight and fast web browser designed for resource-constrained systems. it prioritizes speed and efficiency, making it ideal for older computers, embedded devices, or users seeking fundamental web browsing without modern complexities.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Epic Browser

Epic Browser

Pros

  • Strong built-in privacy features (ad, tracker, proxy)
  • Easy to use with a familiar interface
  • Privacy-focused by default
  • Good performance based on Chromium
  • Built-in basic security features

Cons

  • Limited extension compatibility
  • Built-in proxy not a full VPN alternative
Dillo

Dillo

Pros

  • Extremely fast on limited hardware
  • Requires very few system resources
  • Built-in basic ad-blocking
  • Enhanced privacy by design
  • Portable and lightweight

Cons

  • Limited support for modern web standards (CSS, JavaScript)
  • Many modern websites may not render correctly or function
  • Minimalistic user interface with limited features
  • Lack of extensibility via plugins/extensions
  • Not suitable for accessing complex web applications

Compare With Others

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare