Epic Browser vs Dillo

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Epic Browser icon

Epic Browser

Epic Browser is a privacy-focused web browser built on the Chromium source code, designed to shield users from online tracking and threats through integrated privacy tools like a built-in ad blocker, tracker blocker, and encrypted proxy. by Hidden Reflex

Free
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows
Screenshots:
VS
Dillo icon

Dillo

Dillo is an exceptionally lightweight and fast web browser designed for resource-constrained systems. It prioritizes speed and efficiency, making it ideal for older computers, embedded devices, or users seeking fundamental web browsing without modern complexities.

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Linux Xfce
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Epic Browser and Dillo are both powerful solutions in their space. Epic Browser offers epic browser is a privacy-focused web browser built on the chromium source code, designed to shield users from online tracking and threats through integrated privacy tools like a built-in ad blocker, tracker blocker, and encrypted proxy., while Dillo provides dillo is an exceptionally lightweight and fast web browser designed for resource-constrained systems. it prioritizes speed and efficiency, making it ideal for older computers, embedded devices, or users seeking fundamental web browsing without modern complexities.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Epic Browser

Epic Browser

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Strong built-in privacy features (ad, tracker, proxy)
Easy to use with a familiar interface
Privacy-focused by default
Good performance based on Chromium
Built-in basic security features

Limitations

Limited extension compatibility
Built-in proxy not a full VPN alternative
Dillo

Dillo

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely fast on limited hardware
Requires very few system resources
Built-in basic ad-blocking
Enhanced privacy by design
Portable and lightweight

Limitations

Limited support for modern web standards (CSS, JavaScript)
Many modern websites may not render correctly or function
Minimalistic user interface with limited features
Lack of extensibility via plugins/extensions
Not suitable for accessing complex web applications

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare