Fiddler vs Zed Attack Proxy

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Fiddler icon

Fiddler

Fiddler is a free web debugging proxy that logs HTTP(S) traffic between your computer and the Internet. It allows you to inspect and modify traffic, set breakpoints, mock responses, and analyze performance. by Telerik (Eric Lawrence)

Free
Platforms: Windows
Screenshots:
VS
Zed Attack Proxy icon

Zed Attack Proxy

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is a free and open-source web application security scanner. It helps developers and penetration testers find security vulnerabilities in web applications during the development and testing phases.

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Fiddler and Zed Attack Proxy are both powerful solutions in their space. Fiddler offers fiddler is a free web debugging proxy that logs http(s) traffic between your computer and the internet. it allows you to inspect and modify traffic, set breakpoints, mock responses, and analyze performance., while Zed Attack Proxy provides zed attack proxy (zap) is a free and open-source web application security scanner. it helps developers and penetration testers find security vulnerabilities in web applications during the development and testing phases.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Fiddler

Fiddler

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Provides deep visibility into HTTP/S traffic.
Allows modification of requests and responses.
Excellent for debugging and performance analysis.
Supports setting breakpoints.
Free to use with powerful features.
Extensible with scripting and add-ons.

Limitations

Can have a learning curve for beginners.
Requires certificate installation for HTTPS decryption.
User interface can be busy with information.
Zed Attack Proxy

Zed Attack Proxy

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Free and open source, making it highly accessible.
Comprehensive set of features for both automated and manual testing.
Highly extensible through a wide range of add-ons.
Strong community support and active development.
Suitable for both beginners and experienced security professionals.
Can be integrated into automated workflows.

Limitations

Can have a learning curve to utilize advanced features.
May generate false positives that require manual verification.
Resource usage can be significant for scanning large applications.
Configuration can be complex for some advanced scenarios.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare