Fiddler VS Zed Attack Proxy
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is primarily designed for security testing and penetration testing, making it the choice for security professionals, while Fiddler excels in performance testing and offers a user-friendly interface, suitable for developers and testers focused on debugging and performance optimization. ZAP is open-source and free, while Fiddler has both free and paid versions, with a strong emphasis on automation and ease of use.
Fiddler
Pros:
- User-friendly interface
- Excellent performance testing features
- Cost-effective (free version available)
- Wide range of protocols supported
- Robust automation capabilities
Cons:
- Limited security testing features
- Less customizable than ZAP
- Some advanced features require paid version
- Not open-source
- May not be suitable for deep security analysis
Zed Attack Proxy
Pros:
- Open-source and free to use
- Strong focus on security testing
- Rich feature set for penetration testing
- Active community and regular updates
- Good support for manual testing
Cons:
- Less user-friendly for beginners
- Limited performance testing features
- No official support
- More complex setup process
- Not primarily designed for performance testing
Compare Fiddler
Compare apptalk.ninja and Fiddler and decide which is most suitable for you.
