FileZilla vs Cyberduck Comparison
Compare features to find which solution is best for your needs.

FileZilla
FileZilla is a popular open-source FTP, FTPS, and SFTP client, known for its ease of use and robust feature set. It provides a reliable way to transfer files to and from remote servers, supporting a wide range of protocols for secure and efficient data handling. by FileZilla Project

Cyberduck
Cyberduck is a free, open-source client for file transfer, supporting FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, and major cloud storage services. It provides a user-friendly interface for managing files on servers and in the cloud. by iterate GmbH
Summary
FileZilla and Cyberduck are both powerful solutions in their space. FileZilla offers filezilla is a popular open-source ftp, ftps, and sftp client, known for its ease of use and robust feature set. it provides a reliable way to transfer files to and from remote servers, supporting a wide range of protocols for secure and efficient data handling., while Cyberduck provides cyberduck is a free, open-source client for file transfer, supporting ftp, sftp, webdav, and major cloud storage services. it provides a user-friendly interface for managing files on servers and in the cloud.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.
Pros & Cons Comparison

FileZilla
Pros
- Free and open source with broad protocol support (FTP, FTPS, SFTP).
- User-friendly interface with drag-and-drop functionality.
- Effective Site Manager for saving and managing connections.
- Supports large file transfers and resuming interrupted uploads/downloads.
- Available on multiple operating systems.
- Configurable transfer speed limits.
Cons
- Standard Windows installer has been known to bundle extra software.
- User interface can feel somewhat outdated.
- Can experience occasional connectivity issues depending on server configurations.

Cyberduck
Pros
- Supports a wide range of protocols (FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, S3, Azure, etc.)
- Clean and user-friendly interface
- Integrates with major cloud storage providers
- Ability to mount remote storage as local drive (via associated tool)
- File sharing and preview features
- Open source and actively developed
Cons
- Synchronization features are basic compared to dedicated sync tools
- Performance can vary based on connection/service speed
- Some advanced features require paid extensions