FileZilla vs Cyberduck : Which is Better?

FileZilla icon

FileZilla

FileZilla is an open source FTP (File Sharing Protocol) client for connecting to remote FTP servers. Developed by FileZilla Project

License: Open Source

Categories: File Management

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Linux BSD PortableApps.com

VS
VS
Cyberduck icon

Cyberduck

Cyberduck is an open source client for FTP and SFTP, WebDAV, and cloud storage. Developed by iterate GmbH

License: Open Source

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows

FileZilla VS Cyberduck

Cyberduck offers advanced features including cloud service integration and strong security options, making it suitable for professional users. In contrast, FileZilla is a free, lightweight tool that provides essential FTP functionalities, making it a great choice for beginners and those who prefer simplicity.

FileZilla

Pros:

  • Open-source and completely free to use
  • Lightweight and fast performance
  • Easy to set up and use for beginners
  • Supports FTP, SFTP, and FTPS protocols
  • Provides drag and drop functionality
  • Includes a transfer queue for managing multiple uploads
  • Customizable settings for advanced users
  • Multi-language support available
  • Supports multiple connections at once
  • Regular updates and strong community support

Cons:

  • Lacks integration with cloud services
  • No built-in file encryption
  • User interface may seem outdated compared to Cyberduck
  • Limited support for directory synchronization
  • Not as feature-rich as Cyberduck for advanced users

Cyberduck

Pros:

  • Supports various cloud storage services
  • User-friendly interface with a clean design
  • Strong security features including encryption
  • Offers bookmarking for quick access to frequently used servers
  • Allows remote editing of files easily
  • Customizable interface with advanced options
  • Supports directory synchronization for easier management
  • Multi-language support for global users
  • Batch transfer capabilities for efficient file management
  • Regular updates with new features and improvements

Cons:

  • Not free; requires a purchase for full features
  • Limited support for FTP protocols compared to FileZilla
  • Can be resource-intensive on older machines
  • Less customizable than FileZilla in certain aspects
  • Some features may be too advanced for basic users

Compare FileZilla

vs
Compare Air Explorer and FileZilla and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare AnyClient and FileZilla and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare BitKinex and FileZilla and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare CarotDAV and FileZilla and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare CuteFTP and FileZilla and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare ExpanDrive and FileZilla and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare FireFTP and FileZilla and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Flow and FileZilla and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Forklift and FileZilla and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare FTPbox and FileZilla and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare FTP Rush and FileZilla and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare gFTP and FileZilla and decide which is most suitable for you.