FreeCommander vs Xarchiver : Which is Better?

FreeCommander icon

FreeCommander

FreeCommander is a freeware file manager with built-in FTP client, archive handling, multi-rename, wipe files and MD5 checksums. Developed by Marek Jasinski - Moosburg, Germany

License: Free

Apps available for Windows

VS
VS
Xarchiver icon

Xarchiver

Xarchiver is a front-end to various command line archiving tools for Linux and BSD operating systems, designed to be independent of the desktop environment. It is the default archiving application of Xfce and LXDE. Developed by Giuseppe Torelli - Colossus

License: Open Source

Categories: File Management

Apps available for Linux BSD Xfce

FreeCommander VS Xarchiver

FreeCommander is a robust dual-pane file management tool with extensive features aimed at Windows users, while Xarchiver is a lightweight, open-source archiving tool suitable for Linux and Windows users, focusing on compression and file management. FreeCommander excels in its user interface customization and dual-pane navigation, whereas Xarchiver is recognized for its simplicity and cross-platform support.

FreeCommander

Pros:

  • Dual-pane interface for easy file management
  • Supports various file formats including zip, rar, and more
  • Built-in FTP client for file transfers
  • Customizable user interface with skins
  • Supports tabbed browsing for multiple directories
  • Has a portable version for USB use
  • File search functionality with filters
  • Multi-language support
  • File comparison and synchronization features
  • Integrated file viewer for images and text

Cons:

  • Can be overwhelming for new users due to its many features
  • Windows only; not available for Linux or Mac
  • Occasional bugs in the software updates

Xarchiver

Pros:

  • Lightweight and fast performance
  • Supports a wide range of compression formats
  • Simple and intuitive user interface
  • Integrated file manager capabilities
  • Open-source and free to use
  • Cross-platform compatibility (Linux, Windows)
  • Multi-threaded extraction for faster performance
  • Command-line support for advanced users
  • Ability to create and manage archives easily
  • Supports encryption for secure file storage

Cons:

  • Limited features compared to full-fledged file managers
  • Less user-friendly for those unfamiliar with archiving tools
  • May lack advanced file management features

Compare FreeCommander

vs
Compare Altap Salamander and FreeCommander and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare AppCompactor and FreeCommander and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare One Commander and FreeCommander and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Clover and FreeCommander and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Commander One and FreeCommander and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare CubicExplorer and FreeCommander and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Directory Opus and FreeCommander and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Dolphin File Manager and FreeCommander and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Double Commander and FreeCommander and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Explorer++ and FreeCommander and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Far Manager and FreeCommander and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Filelight and FreeCommander and decide which is most suitable for you.