Freemat vs Mathematica : Which is Better?

Freemat icon

Freemat

FreeMat is a free environment for rapid engineering and scientific prototyping and data processing.

License: Open Source

Categories: Education & Reference

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Linux PortableApps.com Discontinued

VS
VS
Mathematica icon

Mathematica

Wolfram Mathematica (usually termed Mathematica, Mathematica software suite) is a mathematical symbolic computation program. Developed by Wolfram Research

License: Commercial

Categories: Education & Reference

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Linux Online

Freemat VS Mathematica

Freemat is a free and open-source numerical computing environment that is ideal for educational purposes and simpler numerical tasks, while Mathematica offers advanced symbolic computation, a rich set of built-in functions, and extensive support for machine learning, making it more suitable for complex mathematical modeling and professional use. The choice between them often comes down to budget and specific use case requirements.

Freemat

Pros:

  • Open-source and free to use
  • Good for numerical computations
  • User-friendly interface
  • Active community support
  • Cross-platform compatibility
  • Lightweight and fast
  • Extensible with external libraries
  • Good for educational purposes
  • Simple installation process
  • Supports 3D plotting

Cons:

  • Limited symbolic computation features
  • Less powerful for complex mathematical tasks
  • Smaller user base
  • Fewer built-in functions compared to Mathematica
  • May lack advanced features for professional use
  • Support primarily through community forums
  • Less frequent updates
  • Limited machine learning capabilities
  • Not ideal for commercial use
  • Documentation less comprehensive

Mathematica

Pros:

  • Powerful symbolic computation capabilities
  • Rich set of built-in functions
  • Advanced data visualization options
  • Excellent documentation and resources
  • Strong support for machine learning
  • Highly extensible
  • Robust for complex mathematical modeling
  • Supports interactive notebooks
  • Cross-platform compatibility
  • Widely used in academia and industry

Cons:

  • High cost for licensing
  • Steeper learning curve
  • Resource-intensive
  • May not be necessary for simple tasks
  • Some features may be overwhelming for beginners
  • Can be slow on older hardware
  • Requires a license for full features
  • Less focus on numerical analysis
  • Potentially more complex interface
  • Limited community support compared to Freemat

Compare Freemat

vs
GNU Octave vs Freemat
Compare GNU Octave and Freemat and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Maple vs Freemat
Compare Maple and Freemat and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
MATLAB vs Freemat
Compare MATLAB and Freemat and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Sage vs Freemat
Compare Sage and Freemat and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Scilab vs Freemat
Compare Scilab and Freemat and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
SciPy & Numpy vs Freemat
Compare SciPy & Numpy and Freemat and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Spyder vs Freemat
Compare Spyder and Freemat and decide which is most suitable for you.