Git vs Apache Subversion : Which is Better?

Git icon

Git

Git is a code version control system for keeping track of changes in code. Developed by Linus Torvalds

License: Open Source

Categories: Development

Apps available for Mac OS X Linux Android iPhone BSD

VS
VS
Apache Subversion icon

Apache Subversion

Apache Subversion (SVN) is a software versioning and revision control system distributed as open source under the Apache License. Developed by Apache Software Foundation

License: Open Source

Categories: Development

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Linux BSD Haiku

Git VS Apache Subversion

Apache Subversion is a centralized version control system that excels in managing permissions and is simpler for beginners, making it suitable for linear workflows. Git, on the other hand, is a distributed version control system that supports offline work, powerful branching, and merging, offering greater flexibility and speed for larger projects.

Git

Pros:

  • Distributed model allows for offline work
  • Fast performance with large repositories
  • Powerful branching and merging capabilities
  • Flexible workflows suited for agile development
  • Atomic commits for better consistency
  • Rich ecosystem of tools and extensions
  • Efficient storage and handling of large files
  • Strong community support and resources
  • Better suited for open-source projects
  • Good integration with CI/CD tools

Cons:

  • Steeper learning curve for beginners
  • Complex to manage for large teams
  • Potentially higher storage requirements
  • Conflicts can be challenging to resolve
  • May require more setup and maintenance
  • Not as user-friendly for non-technical users
  • Can be overwhelming with too many options
  • Less suitable for projects needing strict access control
  • Performance can vary based on repository size
  • Complex history can be hard to navigate

Apache Subversion

Pros:

  • Simple and easy to learn for beginners
  • Centralized version control makes it easier to manage permissions
  • Better suited for large binary files
  • Strong support for branching and merging
  • Reliable for small to medium-sized projects
  • Consistent performance with large repositories
  • Great for projects that require a single source of truth
  • Good for teams that prefer a linear development model
  • Strong access control features
  • Robust backup and restore options

Cons:

  • Limited offline capabilities
  • Not as performant with very large repositories
  • More complex branching and merging
  • Difficulties with large teams and extensive history
  • Limited customization options
  • Requires more server management
  • Less support for non-text files
  • Steeper learning curve for advanced features
  • Linear workflow can be restrictive
  • Less flexible for modern development practices

Compare Git

vs
Compare Bazaar and Git and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Fossil and Git and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Mercurial SCM and Git and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Perforce and Git and decide which is most suitable for you.