Google Earth vs OsmAnd

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Google Earth icon

Google Earth

Google Earth is a powerful software platform that provides a 3D representation of the Earth based on satellite imagery, aerial photography, and GIS data. It allows users to explore the globe virtually, view geographical details, and access a wealth of location-based information. by Google Inc.

Free Personal
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux Android iPhone Android Tablet BSD iPad
Screenshots:
VS
OsmAnd icon

OsmAnd

OsmAnd is an open-source, offline-first map and navigation application leveraging OpenStreetMap data. It provides turn-by-turn navigation, detailed offline maps, and a wealth of features for various activities like driving, cycling, and hiking, emphasizing privacy and customization. by OsmAnd team

Freemium
Platforms: Android iPhone Blackberry Android Tablet iPad OpenStreetMap Kindle Fire
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Google Earth and OsmAnd are both powerful solutions in their space. Google Earth offers google earth is a powerful software platform that provides a 3d representation of the earth based on satellite imagery, aerial photography, and gis data. it allows users to explore the globe virtually, view geographical details, and access a wealth of location-based information., while OsmAnd provides osmand is an open-source, offline-first map and navigation application leveraging openstreetmap data. it provides turn-by-turn navigation, detailed offline maps, and a wealth of features for various activities like driving, cycling, and hiking, emphasizing privacy and customization.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Google Earth

Google Earth

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Highly detailed and explorable 3D representation of Earth.
Vast collection of high-resolution satellite and aerial imagery.
Seamless integration of Street View for ground-level perspectives.
Access to historical imagery to observe changes over time.
Useful measurement tools for distances and areas.

Limitations

Imagery resolution and recency can vary significantly by location.
3D models of buildings are often simplified.
Interface can feel somewhat cluttered at times.
Performance can be demanding on less powerful hardware or slow internet connections.
OsmAnd

OsmAnd

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Excellent offline map and navigation capabilities.
Based on detailed and community-driven OpenStreetMap data.
Highly customizable with numerous options for display and behavior.
Open-source with a strong focus on user privacy.
Supports a wide range of navigation modes including cycling and hiking.

Limitations

User interface can be complex and has a steeper learning curve.
Requires significant storage space for downloaded offline maps.
Map data quality can vary depending on OpenStreetMap coverage in an area.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare