Grav vs Known Comparison
Compare features to find which solution is best for your needs.

Grav
Grav is a fast, flexible, and open-source flat-file CMS (Content Management System) that simplifies website creation and management. Requiring no database, it leverages the power of Markdown and Twig templating for efficient content delivery and extensive customization. by RocketTheme

Known
Known is a decentralized publishing platform built on the principles of the IndieWeb, empowering users to own their content and data. It offers a versatile environment for blogging, photo sharing, and social networking with a focus on user control and privacy. by Known, Inc
Summary
Grav and Known are both powerful solutions in their space. Grav offers grav is a fast, flexible, and open-source flat-file cms (content management system) that simplifies website creation and management. requiring no database, it leverages the power of markdown and twig templating for efficient content delivery and extensive customization., while Known provides known is a decentralized publishing platform built on the principles of the indieweb, empowering users to own their content and data. it offers a versatile environment for blogging, photo sharing, and social networking with a focus on user control and privacy.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.
Pros & Cons Comparison

Grav
Pros
- Extremely fast performance due to flat-file architecture.
- Easy installation and migration (no database required).
- Flexible and powerful Twig templating.
- Extensive plugin ecosystem for added functionality.
- Developer-friendly with a clean codebase and strong API.
Cons
- Steeper learning curve for non-technical users compared to some alternatives.
- Managing very large sites with complex content relationships can be less efficient than database systems.
- Reliance on file permissions for security.
- Community support is primary; dedicated commercial support requires external vendors.

Known
Pros
- User owns and controls all content and data.
- Supports various types of content (blogs, photos, microblogging).
- Decentralized architecture reduces reliance on single entities.
- Integration with IndieWeb principles.
- Ability to cross-post to centralized social media.
- Customizable through themes and plugins.
Cons
- Requires technical knowledge for self-hosting and maintenance.
- Documentation can be complex for beginners.
- Finding compatible hosting can sometimes be a challenge.
- Community support may be needed for troubleshooting.