GTK+ vs wxWidgets

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

GTK+ icon

GTK+

GTK (formerly GTK+), or the GIMP Toolkit, is a free and open-source cross-platform widget toolkit for creating graphical user interfaces (GUIs). It's written in C and offers bindings for numerous other programming languages, making it highly versatile for building desktop applications. by GNOME Foundation

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux
Screenshots:
VS
wxWidgets icon

wxWidgets

wxWidgets is a mature, open-source C++ library that empowers developers to create cross-platform graphical user interfaces (GUIs) with native look and feel.

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux

Comparison Summary

GTK+ and wxWidgets are both powerful solutions in their space. GTK+ offers gtk (formerly gtk+), or the gimp toolkit, is a free and open-source cross-platform widget toolkit for creating graphical user interfaces (guis). it's written in c and offers bindings for numerous other programming languages, making it highly versatile for building desktop applications., while wxWidgets provides wxwidgets is a mature, open-source c++ library that empowers developers to create cross-platform graphical user interfaces (guis) with native look and feel.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

GTK+

GTK+

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Excellent cross-platform support for Linux, Windows, and macOS.
Mature and stable toolkit with a long history of development.
Comprehensive set of widgets for building diverse interfaces.
Strong community support and extensive documentation.
Supports a wide range of programming language bindings.

Limitations

Learning curve can be steeper compared to some higher-level toolkits.
Achieving perfect native look and feel on all platforms may require extra effort.
wxWidgets

wxWidgets

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Native look and feel on each platform.
Permissive license suitable for commercial applications.
Mature and stable codebase with a long history.
Strong bindings for popular scripting languages like Python and Ruby.
Comprehensive set of widgets and features.

Limitations

Less visual design tool support compared to some other toolkits.
Documentation can be extensive, requiring time to navigate.
Can be perceived as less 'modern' in appearance compared to kits with extensive custom styling capabilities.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement