Hugo vs Jekyll : Which is Better?

Hugo icon

Hugo

Hugo is a framework for building websites.

License: Open Source

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Linux Self-Hosted

VS
VS
Jekyll icon

Jekyll

Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Developed by Tom Preston-Werner, Nick Quaranto

License: Open Source

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Linux Self-Hosted

Hugo VS Jekyll

Hugo is known for its speed and efficiency, making it ideal for larger sites, while Jekyll offers a more extensive plugin ecosystem and is beginner-friendly. Both are excellent static site generators, but their underlying technologies and community support differ significantly.

Hugo

Pros:

  • Fast build times due to its static site generator capabilities
  • Supports a wide variety of templates and themes
  • Written in Go, which is efficient and has a small footprint
  • Built-in multilingual support
  • Extensive documentation and community support

Cons:

  • Steeper learning curve for beginners due to its Go language
  • Limited plugin ecosystem compared to Jekyll
  • Fewer themes available than Jekyll

Jekyll

Pros:

  • Mature ecosystem with a large number of plugins
  • Easy to set up and use, especially for beginners
  • Written in Ruby, which many developers are familiar with
  • Strong support for Markdown and Liquid templating
  • Good for blogs and documentation sites

Cons:

  • Slower build times for larger sites compared to Hugo
  • Dependency on Ruby environment for setup
  • Less flexibility in templating compared to Hugo

Compare Hugo

vs
Compare Blogger and Hugo and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Ghost and Hugo and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Ucraft and Hugo and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Weebly and Hugo and decide which is most suitable for you.