i3 vs awesome

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

i3

i3 is a highly configurable, lightweight tiling window manager designed for advanced users and developers on GNU/Linux and BSD systems. It offers a keyboard-driven workflow, efficient window management through tiling layouts, and powerful extensibility.

Open Source

Platforms: Linux BSD

Screenshots:

Alternatives Details Website

awesome

awesome is a highly customizable, next-generation tiling window manager for the X Window System. It focuses on providing a highly efficient workflow for developers and power users through extensive configurability and a powerful API.

Open Source

Platforms: Linux BSD

Screenshots:

Alternatives Details Website

Comparison Summary

i3 and awesome are both powerful solutions in their space. i3 offers i3 is a highly configurable, lightweight tiling window manager designed for advanced users and developers on gnu/linux and bsd systems. it offers a keyboard-driven workflow, efficient window management through tiling layouts, and powerful extensibility., while awesome provides awesome is a highly customizable, next-generation tiling window manager for the x window system. it focuses on providing a highly efficient workflow for developers and power users through extensive configurability and a powerful api.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

i3

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Highly efficient tiling layout optimizes screen usage.

Extensive keyboard shortcuts for fast and efficient control.

Lightweight and minimal resource consumption.

Extremely customizable via a plain text configuration file.

Active community and excellent documentation.

Limitations

Steep learning curve for users new to tiling window managers.

Requires separate installation and configuration of other desktop components (e.g., panel, launcher).

Relies heavily on keyboard interaction, which may not suit all users.

awesome

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely customizable via Lua scripting.

Highly efficient for users who prefer keyboard control.

Lightweight and resource-friendly.

Excellent for managing multiple windows and tasks.

Flexible tag-based workspace management.

Limitations

Steep learning curve requires time and effort to configure.

Configuration is done via text files (Lua), no graphical tools are included by default.

Relies heavily on keyboard shortcuts, which need to be learned.

Documentation can be dispersed.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Fluxbox vs i3

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Openbox vs i3

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare