i3 vs Fluxbox : Which is Better?

i3 icon

i3

i3 is a tiling window manager, completely written from scratch. The target platforms are GNU/Linux and BSD operating systems, our code is Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) under the BSD license. i3 is primarily targeted at advanced users and developers.

License: Open Source

Categories: OS & Utilities

Apps available for Linux BSD

VS
VS
Fluxbox icon

Fluxbox

Fluxbox is a stacking window manager for the X Window System, which started as a fork of Blackbox.

License: Open Source

Categories: OS & Utilities

Apps available for Linux BSD

i3 VS Fluxbox

Fluxbox is a highly configurable, lightweight window manager with a minimalistic design, ideal for users who prefer simplicity and speed. In contrast, i3 offers dynamic tiling and efficient window management, making it a better choice for power users who need robust functionality and multi-monitor support.

i3

Pros:

  • Dynamic window management
  • Efficient tiling system
  • Support for multiple monitors
  • Extensive documentation
  • Active community

Cons:

  • Requires more initial setup
  • May be complex for beginners
  • Less visually appealing than some other managers

Fluxbox

Pros:

  • Lightweight and fast
  • Highly configurable
  • Supports multiple workspaces
  • Minimalistic design
  • Customizable keybindings

Cons:

  • Limited out-of-the-box features
  • Steeper learning curve for new users
  • Less active development compared to i3

Compare i3

vs
Compare awesome and i3 and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Openbox and i3 and decide which is most suitable for you.