IINA vs mpv

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

IINA icon

IINA

IINA is a modern, free, and open-source media player designed exclusively for macOS, built upon the powerful mpv playback engine. It offers a stunning user interface, a comprehensive feature set, and seamless integration with macOS. by Collider LI

Open Source
Platforms: Mac mpv
Screenshots:
VS
mpv icon

mpv

mpv is a free and open-source command-line media player derived from MPlayer and mplayer2. It boasts a minimalist user interface and powerful scripting capabilities, offering excellent video and audio playback with low resource consumption.

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux BSD Xfce
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

IINA and mpv are both powerful solutions in their space. IINA offers iina is a modern, free, and open-source media player designed exclusively for macos, built upon the powerful mpv playback engine. it offers a stunning user interface, a comprehensive feature set, and seamless integration with macos., while mpv provides mpv is a free and open-source command-line media player derived from mplayer and mplayer2. it boasts a minimalist user interface and powerful scripting capabilities, offering excellent video and audio playback with low resource consumption.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

IINA

IINA

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Stunning and truly native macOS interface.
Excellent format support via the powerful mpv engine.
Extensive subtitle features, including automatic download.
Seamless integration with macOS features like Touch Bar and Picture in Picture.
Highly customizable settings and appearance.
Free and open-source with active development.

Limitations

Advanced settings can be overwhelming for new users.
Online streaming compatibility can vary.
Might lack some niche features compared to highly specialized players.
mpv

mpv

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely lightweight and performant
Excellent video and audio quality
Highly customizable through configuration and scripting
Integrated codecs support a wide range of formats
Minimalist UI is non-intrusive

Limitations

Initial learning curve for configuration can be steep for beginners
Default lack of a traditional graphical interface may be off-putting for some

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare