iTerm2 vs Guake terminal

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

iTerm2 icon

iTerm2

iTerm2 is a powerful, free terminal emulator for macOS, offering a vast array of features beyond the standard Terminal app. It provides enhanced customization, productivity tools like split panes and search, and deep integration with macOS. by George Nachman

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X
Screenshots:
VS
Guake terminal icon

Guake terminal

Guake is a highly configurable dropdown terminal for GNOME environment, inspired by the Quake console. It provides quick access to a command-line interface with a hotkey, staying out of the way when not needed, making it ideal for developers and power users.

Open Source
Platforms: Linux BSD
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

iTerm2 and Guake terminal are both powerful solutions in their space. iTerm2 offers iterm2 is a powerful, free terminal emulator for macos, offering a vast array of features beyond the standard terminal app. it provides enhanced customization, productivity tools like split panes and search, and deep integration with macos., while Guake terminal provides guake is a highly configurable dropdown terminal for gnome environment, inspired by the quake console. it provides quick access to a command-line interface with a hotkey, staying out of the way when not needed, making it ideal for developers and power users.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

iTerm2

iTerm2

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extensive customization options for appearance and behavior.
Powerful productivity features like split panes and integrated search.
Scripting support for automation and extended functionality.
Profiles allow for saving and switching between different configurations.
Enhanced integration with macOS features.

Limitations

Can be overwhelming for new users due to the large number of options.
Initial setup and configuration may take time to optimize.
Guake terminal

Guake terminal

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Instantly accessible via hotkey.
Keeps desktop clean when not in use.
Excellent tab and split-pane management.
Highly customizable appearance and behavior.
Well-integrated within the GNOME environment.

Limitations

Primarily designed for GNOME, may not work optimally elsewhere.
Configuration management could be more developer-friendly (e.g., dotfiles).
Plugin ecosystem is not as extensive as some other competitors.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare