Jekyll vs Hugo : Which is Better?
Jekyll
Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Developed by Tom Preston-Werner, Nick Quaranto
License: Open Source
VS
VS
Jekyll VS Hugo
Hugo is known for its speed and efficiency, making it ideal for larger sites, while Jekyll offers a more extensive plugin ecosystem and is beginner-friendly. Both are excellent static site generators, but their underlying technologies and community support differ significantly.
Jekyll
Pros:
- Mature ecosystem with a large number of plugins
- Easy to set up and use, especially for beginners
- Written in Ruby, which many developers are familiar with
- Strong support for Markdown and Liquid templating
- Good for blogs and documentation sites
Cons:
- Slower build times for larger sites compared to Hugo
- Dependency on Ruby environment for setup
- Less flexibility in templating compared to Hugo
Hugo
Pros:
- Fast build times due to its static site generator capabilities
- Supports a wide variety of templates and themes
- Written in Go, which is efficient and has a small footprint
- Built-in multilingual support
- Extensive documentation and community support
Cons:
- Steeper learning curve for beginners due to its Go language
- Limited plugin ecosystem compared to Jekyll
- Fewer themes available than Jekyll
Compare Jekyll
Compare blogstrap.py and Jekyll and decide which is most suitable for you.
