Jenkins vs Hudson

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Jenkins icon

Jenkins

Jenkins is a leading open-source automation server that enables developers to reliably build, test, and deploy their software. It supports various version control systems and build tools, making it a central hub for continuous integration and continuous delivery pipelines. by R.Tyler Croy

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux BSD Self-Hosted
Screenshots:
VS
Hudson icon

Hudson

Hudson is an extensively customizable continuous integration server that automates the build, test, and deployment of software projects. Designed for on-premises or private cloud deployment, it supports distributed builds and offers a rich plugin ecosystem for broad technology compatibility.

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux Self-Hosted
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Jenkins and Hudson are both powerful solutions in their space. Jenkins offers jenkins is a leading open-source automation server that enables developers to reliably build, test, and deploy their software. it supports various version control systems and build tools, making it a central hub for continuous integration and continuous delivery pipelines., while Hudson provides hudson is an extensively customizable continuous integration server that automates the build, test, and deployment of software projects. designed for on-premises or private cloud deployment, it supports distributed builds and offers a rich plugin ecosystem for broad technology compatibility.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Jenkins

Jenkins

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Highly extensible and customizable through a large plugin ecosystem.
Free and open-source, eliminating licensing costs.
Strong community support and extensive documentation.
Supports complex pipeline definitions using Pipeline as Code.
Can be deployed on-premises for maximum control and data security.

Limitations

Traditional web UI can appear outdated compared to newer platforms.
Managing numerous plugins can become complex.
Initial setup and configuration may pose a learning curve for some.
Requires self-hosting and ongoing maintenance by the user.
Performance can vary based on configuration and workload.
Hudson

Hudson

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

High degree of configuration and control.
Extensive plugin ecosystem supports many technologies.
Suitable for on-premises or private cloud deployments.
Supports distributed builds for scalability.

Limitations

User interface can feel dated compared to modern tools.
Requires self-hosting and management.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare