JetBrains TeamCity vs Hudson

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

JetBrains TeamCity icon

JetBrains TeamCity

TeamCity is an advanced, Java-based build management and continuous integration server developed by JetBrains. It provides robust tools to streamline your software development lifecycle, from continuous integration and delivery to build automation and testing. by JetBrains

Free Personal
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux Online
Screenshots:
VS
Hudson icon

Hudson

Hudson is an extensively customizable continuous integration server that automates the build, test, and deployment of software projects. Designed for on-premises or private cloud deployment, it supports distributed builds and offers a rich plugin ecosystem for broad technology compatibility.

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux Self-Hosted
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

JetBrains TeamCity and Hudson are both powerful solutions in their space. JetBrains TeamCity offers teamcity is an advanced, java-based build management and continuous integration server developed by jetbrains. it provides robust tools to streamline your software development lifecycle, from continuous integration and delivery to build automation and testing., while Hudson provides hudson is an extensively customizable continuous integration server that automates the build, test, and deployment of software projects. designed for on-premises or private cloud deployment, it supports distributed builds and offers a rich plugin ecosystem for broad technology compatibility.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

JetBrains TeamCity

JetBrains TeamCity

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Robust and feature-rich platform for CI/CD.
Excellent reporting and monitoring capabilities.
Highly scalable with distributed build agents.
Strong integration with various development tools.
Well-documented and active community.

Limitations

Licensing can be costly for large teams.
Configuration of complex pipelines can be challenging.
User interface can be dense in some areas.
Hudson

Hudson

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

High degree of configuration and control.
Extensive plugin ecosystem supports many technologies.
Suitable for on-premises or private cloud deployments.
Supports distributed builds for scalability.

Limitations

User interface can feel dated compared to modern tools.
Requires self-hosting and management.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare