Kaspersky Anti-Virus vs Clam AntiVirus

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Kaspersky Anti-Virus icon

Kaspersky Anti-Virus

Kaspersky Anti-Virus is a robust security solution providing essential protection against a wide range of cyber threats, including malware, viruses, and ransomware. It utilizes advanced technologies for real-time scanning and proactive defense to keep your PC safe. by Kaspersky Lab

Commercial
Platforms: Windows
Screenshots:
VS
Clam AntiVirus icon

Clam AntiVirus

Clam AntiVirus (ClamAV) is a free, open-source antivirus engine designed for scanning emails, files, and directories for various types of malicious software, including viruses, worms, and Trojans. by Cisco

Open Source
Platforms: Windows Linux
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Kaspersky Anti-Virus and Clam AntiVirus are both powerful solutions in their space. Kaspersky Anti-Virus offers kaspersky anti-virus is a robust security solution providing essential protection against a wide range of cyber threats, including malware, viruses, and ransomware. it utilizes advanced technologies for real-time scanning and proactive defense to keep your pc safe., while Clam AntiVirus provides clam antivirus (clamav) is a free, open-source antivirus engine designed for scanning emails, files, and directories for various types of malicious software, including viruses, worms, and trojans.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Kaspersky Anti-Virus

Kaspersky Anti-Virus

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Excellent malware detection rates
Effective protection against zero-day threats
User-friendly and intuitive interface
Minimal impact on system performance
Automatic updates for continuous protection

Limitations

Lacks features found in higher-tier suites (e.g., firewall, VPN, parental control)
Clam AntiVirus

Clam AntiVirus

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Free and open-source, no licensing costs
Excellent for server-side scanning, especially email
Flexible command-line interface allows for automation and integration
Frequently updated virus signature database
Cross-platform compatibility
Lightweight and resource efficient

Limitations

Primarily command-line based, lacks a standard graphical user interface
Real-time scanning requires additional configuration or tools
Not a complete endpoint security solution out-of-the-box
Detection rates can sometimes lag behind top commercial solutions for certain targeted threats

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare