KDE vs MATE

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

KDE icon

KDE

KDE Plasma is a powerful, versatile, and customizable graphical desktop environment designed for Linux and other Unix-like systems. It offers a modern interface, extensive configuration options, and a wide range of included applications, aiming to provide a user-friendly yet highly flexible computing experience. by The KDE Team

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux BSD
Screenshots:
Alternatives Details Website
VS
MATE icon

MATE

MATE is a classic, lightweight desktop environment that continues the GNOME 2 legacy. It offers a traditional and intuitive interface while providing modern functionality and performance.

Open Source
Platforms: Linux BSD
Screenshots:
Alternatives Details Website

Comparison Summary

KDE and MATE are both powerful solutions in their space. KDE offers kde plasma is a powerful, versatile, and customizable graphical desktop environment designed for linux and other unix-like systems. it offers a modern interface, extensive configuration options, and a wide range of included applications, aiming to provide a user-friendly yet highly flexible computing experience., while MATE provides mate is a classic, lightweight desktop environment that continues the gnome 2 legacy. it offers a traditional and intuitive interface while providing modern functionality and performance.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

KDE

KDE

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely customizable interface
Wide range of integrated applications (KDE Gear)
Modular and lightweight architecture
Optimized for performance
Active and supportive community

Limitations

Steep learning curve for deep customization
Extensive settings can be overwhelming
MATE

MATE

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Highly lightweight and performs well on older hardware.
Offers a traditional and familiar user interface (GNOME 2).
Stable and reliable.
Active development and supportive community.
Includes a set of essential core applications.
Customizable layout and functionality.

Limitations

Visuals may appear dated compared to modern desktop environments.
Extension ecosystem is less extensive than some popular alternatives.
May require some user effort to customize initially.
Requires familiarity with the Unix-like operating system it runs on.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Budgie icon
VS
KDE icon
Budgie vs KDE

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Cairo Shell icon
VS
KDE icon
Cairo Shell vs KDE

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Cinnamon icon
VS
KDE icon
Cinnamon vs KDE

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Enlightenment icon
VS
KDE icon
Enlightenment vs KDE

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement
GNOME icon
VS
KDE icon
GNOME vs KDE

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Lumina Desktop Environment icon
VS
KDE icon
Lumina Desktop Environment vs KDE

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
LXDE icon
VS
KDE icon
LXDE vs KDE

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
LXQt icon
VS
KDE icon
LXQt vs KDE

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Xfce icon
VS
KDE icon
Xfce vs KDE

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare