Keeper vs pass

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Keeper icon

Keeper

Keeper is a robust cybersecurity platform providing password management, digital vault, and secure file storage for individuals and businesses of all sizes. It emphasizes strong encryption and zero-knowledge architecture to protect sensitive information across devices. by Callpod Inc.

Commercial
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux Online Android iPhone Blackberry Windows Phone iPad Internet Explorer Google Chrome Safari Kindle Fire Firefox
Screenshots:
VS
pass icon

pass

pass is a lightweight, command-line password manager built on the Unix philosophy. It encrypts passwords using GnuPG and stores them in a simple directory structure, emphasizing simplicity and integration with existing file system tools. by Jason A. Donenfeld aka zx2c4

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Linux BSD Git GnuPG

Comparison Summary

Keeper and pass are both powerful solutions in their space. Keeper offers keeper is a robust cybersecurity platform providing password management, digital vault, and secure file storage for individuals and businesses of all sizes. it emphasizes strong encryption and zero-knowledge architecture to protect sensitive information across devices., while pass provides pass is a lightweight, command-line password manager built on the unix philosophy. it encrypts passwords using gnupg and stores them in a simple directory structure, emphasizing simplicity and integration with existing file system tools.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Keeper

Keeper

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Strong zero-knowledge encryption model for enhanced data security.
Comprehensive feature set including password management, file storage, and secure sharing.
Available across multiple platforms with seamless cloud synchronization.
Business plans offer robust administrative controls and security policies.
Auto-type feature is useful for applications not supporting standard autofill.

Limitations

Pricing can be higher compared to some competing password managers.
User interface, while functional, could be perceived as less modern by some users.
pass

pass

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Highly secure due to GPG encryption and local storage.
Lightweight and fast.
Flexible synchronization options using standard tools.
Simple, transparent, and auditable file-based system.
Excellent for scripting and automation.

Limitations

Requires comfort with command line interface.
Initial setup of GPG can be complex for beginners.
Limited built-in features compared to some graphical managers (e.g., no built-in 2FA management).

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare