Keka vs The Unarchiver

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Keka icon

Keka

Keka is a user-friendly file archiver for macOS, offering robust compression and extraction capabilities for a wide range of formats. Its intuitive drag-and-drop interface simplifies file management and archiving tasks. by aONe

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X
Screenshots:
VS
The Unarchiver icon

The Unarchiver

The Unarchiver is a free, easy-to-use file decompression utility for macOS, designed as a comprehensive replacement for the built-in software. It supports a much wider range of archive formats, making it an essential tool for users who frequently encounter various compressed files beyond the standard ZIP. by Dag Ă…gren

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Keka and The Unarchiver are both powerful solutions in their space. Keka offers keka is a user-friendly file archiver for macos, offering robust compression and extraction capabilities for a wide range of formats. its intuitive drag-and-drop interface simplifies file management and archiving tasks., while The Unarchiver provides the unarchiver is a free, easy-to-use file decompression utility for macos, designed as a comprehensive replacement for the built-in software. it supports a much wider range of archive formats, making it an essential tool for users who frequently encounter various compressed files beyond the standard zip.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Keka

Keka

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Wide support for various archive formats.
Intuitive and easy-to-use drag-and-drop interface.
Strong AES-256 encryption for security.
Lightweight and efficient resource usage.
Clean and minimalist user interface.
Supports splitting large archives.

Limitations

Limited to the macOS platform.
The Unarchiver

The Unarchiver

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Supports a very extensive range of archive formats.
Extremely simple and intuitive to use.
Free of charge.
Lightweight and does not consume significant resources.
Reliably handles password-protected and multi-part archives.

Limitations

Does not support creating archives.
Limited advanced features compared to some paid alternatives.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare