Keka vs Xarchiver

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Keka icon

Keka

Keka is a user-friendly file archiver for macOS, offering robust compression and extraction capabilities for a wide range of formats. Its intuitive drag-and-drop interface simplifies file management and archiving tasks. by aONe

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X
Screenshots:
VS
Xarchiver icon

Xarchiver

Xarchiver is a lightweight, desktop environment-independent archive manager for Linux and BSD systems. It acts as a intuitive graphical frontend to popular command-line archiving utilities, simplifying the process of creating, extracting, and managing various archive types. by Giuseppe Torelli - Colossus

Open Source
Platforms: Linux BSD Xfce
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Keka and Xarchiver are both powerful solutions in their space. Keka offers keka is a user-friendly file archiver for macos, offering robust compression and extraction capabilities for a wide range of formats. its intuitive drag-and-drop interface simplifies file management and archiving tasks., while Xarchiver provides xarchiver is a lightweight, desktop environment-independent archive manager for linux and bsd systems. it acts as a intuitive graphical frontend to popular command-line archiving utilities, simplifying the process of creating, extracting, and managing various archive types.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Keka

Keka

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Wide support for various archive formats.
Intuitive and easy-to-use drag-and-drop interface.
Strong AES-256 encryption for security.
Lightweight and efficient resource usage.
Clean and minimalist user interface.
Supports splitting large archives.

Limitations

Limited to the macOS platform.
Xarchiver

Xarchiver

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Excellent compatibility across various desktop environments due to its GTK foundation.
Very lightweight and resource-efficient, ideal for older or resource-constrained systems.
Supports a wide range of archive formats by leveraging established command-line utilities.
Simple and intuitive user interface for core archiving tasks.
Reliable performance for creating and extracting archives.

Limitations

User interface is basic and lacks modern graphical elements.
Relies on external command-line utilities for format support, which need to be installed separately.
Lacks advanced features like integrated file previews, extensive repair tools, or highly granular compression controls.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare