Kismet vs reaver

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Kismet icon

Kismet

Kismet is a powerful open-source wireless network detector, sniffer, and intrusion detection system. It identifies wireless networks, captures packets, and helps analyze wireless activity for security auditing and network monitoring purposes. Kismet is a vital tool for anyone managing or investigating wireless environments. by Mike Kershaw

Free
Platforms: Linux
Screenshots:
VS
reaver icon

reaver

Reaver is a powerful open-source tool for auditing the security of WiFi Protected Setup (WPS) enabled wireless networks. It allows users to recover WPA/WPA2 passphrases by exploiting vulnerabilities in the WPS protocol's PIN authentication mechanism through a brute-force attack. by Tactical Network Solutions

Open Source
Platforms: Linux
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Kismet and reaver are both powerful solutions in their space. Kismet offers kismet is a powerful open-source wireless network detector, sniffer, and intrusion detection system. it identifies wireless networks, captures packets, and helps analyze wireless activity for security auditing and network monitoring purposes. kismet is a vital tool for anyone managing or investigating wireless environments., while reaver provides reaver is a powerful open-source tool for auditing the security of wifi protected setup (wps) enabled wireless networks. it allows users to recover wpa/wpa2 passphrases by exploiting vulnerabilities in the wps protocol's pin authentication mechanism through a brute-force attack.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Kismet

Kismet

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Powerful passive wireless network discovery and identification.
Robust and detailed wireless packet sniffing capabilities.
Real-time monitoring of networks and client activity.
Open-source with a strong community and extensibility.
Effective at uncovering hidden networks and rogue access points.

Limitations

Requires technical expertise for setup and usage, particularly with command line.
Requires specific wireless hardware capable of monitor mode.
Can be resource-intensive in busy wireless environments.
Primarily terminal-based interface (though GUIs exist).
Steep learning curve for beginners in wireless networking.
reaver

reaver

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Specifically targets and exploits WPS vulnerabilities effectively.
Can recover WPA/WPA2 passphrases on vulnerable networks.
Open source with active development and community support.
Provides detailed control over attack parameters via command line.

Limitations

Only effective against WPS-enabled and vulnerable networks.
Requires technical expertise and command-line proficiency.
Needs a compatible wireless adapter that supports monitor mode and packet injection.
Attack success and duration are highly variable and dependent on the access point.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare