Calypso vs FilePizza

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Calypso icon

Calypso

Calypso is a discontinued cross-platform file-sharing client that operates on the anonymous MUTE network. Developed using C++ and Qt, it offers portability across Windows, Linux, and other environments, prioritizing user privacy and anonymity in file exchange.

Open Source
Platforms: Windows Linux Discontinued
Screenshots:
VS
FilePizza icon

FilePizza

FilePizza offers free peer-to-peer file transfers directly in your web browser. Simply select a file, and a unique link is generated for sharing, enabling recipients to download directly from your browser without needing uploads to a central server. by Alex Kern, Neeraj Baid

Open Source
Platforms: Online Self-Hosted
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Calypso and FilePizza are both powerful solutions in their space. Calypso offers calypso is a discontinued cross-platform file-sharing client that operates on the anonymous mute network. developed using c++ and qt, it offers portability across windows, linux, and other environments, prioritizing user privacy and anonymity in file exchange., while FilePizza provides filepizza offers free peer-to-peer file transfers directly in your web browser. simply select a file, and a unique link is generated for sharing, enabling recipients to download directly from your browser without needing uploads to a central server.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Calypso

Calypso

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Operated on an anonymous network (MUTE) for privacy
Supported multiple operating systems (Windows, Linux)
Allowed resuming interrupted downloads
Included integrated file search

Limitations

Discontinued project, no longer updated or supported
Relied on a small, niche network (MUTE)
User base and file availability were limited
Potential security risks due to lack of updates
FilePizza

FilePizza

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Free and open source
No software installation required
Direct peer-to-peer transfer
Increased privacy as files are not stored on a server
Encryption via WebRTC

Limitations

Sender's browser must remain open for download to complete
Limited features compared to dedicated file sharing services
Performance depends on network conditions of both users
Not suitable for long-term hosting or sharing with offline users

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare