LXTerminal vs Konsole Comparison

Compare features to find which solution is best for your needs.

LXTerminal icon

LXTerminal

LXTerminal is a lightweight and fast terminal emulator specifically designed for the LXDE desktop environment, but adaptable to others. It provides essential features for command-line interaction with a focus on resource efficiency. by LXDE.org

Open Source
Categories:
Available for:
Linux BSD
VS
Konsole icon

Konsole

Konsole is a powerful and highly customizable open-source terminal emulator provided as part of the KDE Applications suite. It offers advanced features like split panes, tabs, session management, and extensive configuration options tailored for developers and power users.

Open Source
Categories:
Available for:
Linux BSD

Summary

LXTerminal and Konsole are both powerful solutions in their space. LXTerminal offers lxterminal is a lightweight and fast terminal emulator specifically designed for the lxde desktop environment, but adaptable to others. it provides essential features for command-line interaction with a focus on resource efficiency., while Konsole provides konsole is a powerful and highly customizable open-source terminal emulator provided as part of the kde applications suite. it offers advanced features like split panes, tabs, session management, and extensive configuration options tailored for developers and power users.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

LXTerminal

LXTerminal

Pros

  • Very lightweight and fast
  • Low resource consumption
  • Simple and clean interface
  • Tabbed interface for multiple sessions

Cons

  • Limited advanced features (scripting, plugins)
  • Less customization options than some alternatives
  • No split-screen or tiling pane support
Konsole

Konsole

Pros

  • Highly customizable appearance and behavior.
  • Excellent session management with tabs and split panes.
  • Lightweight and performant with GPU support.
  • Built-in features like history search and annotation.
  • Seamless integration with the KDE desktop environment.
  • Open-source and actively developed.

Cons

  • Plugin ecosystem could be more extensive.
  • Some advanced features might require a learning curve.
  • Best experienced within the KDE desktop environment, though usable elsewhere.

Compare With Others

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare