MacPass vs pass

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

MacPass icon

MacPass

MacPass is a free and open-source password manager for macOS. It securely stores your usernames and passwords in an encrypted database compatible with KeePass, offering robust protection through password, key file, or combined authentication. by Michael Starke

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X
Screenshots:
VS
pass icon

pass

pass is a lightweight, command-line password manager built on the Unix philosophy. It encrypts passwords using GnuPG and stores them in a simple directory structure, emphasizing simplicity and integration with existing file system tools. by Jason A. Donenfeld aka zx2c4

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Linux BSD Git GnuPG

Comparison Summary

MacPass and pass are both powerful solutions in their space. MacPass offers macpass is a free and open-source password manager for macos. it securely stores your usernames and passwords in an encrypted database compatible with keepass, offering robust protection through password, key file, or combined authentication., while pass provides pass is a lightweight, command-line password manager built on the unix philosophy. it encrypts passwords using gnupg and stores them in a simple directory structure, emphasizing simplicity and integration with existing file system tools.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

MacPass

MacPass

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Free and open-source
Compatible with KeePass databases
Robust security features
Native macOS application
Good user interface

Limitations

May lack some advanced features found in commercial alternatives
Auto-Type compatibility can vary across websites
pass

pass

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Highly secure due to GPG encryption and local storage.
Lightweight and fast.
Flexible synchronization options using standard tools.
Simple, transparent, and auditable file-based system.
Excellent for scripting and automation.

Limitations

Requires comfort with command line interface.
Initial setup of GPG can be complex for beginners.
Limited built-in features compared to some graphical managers (e.g., no built-in 2FA management).

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare