Maple vs SymPy : Which is Better?

Maple icon

Maple

Maple is a symbolic and numeric computing environment, and is also a multi-paradigm programming language. Developed by Maplesoft

License: Commercial

Categories: Education & Reference

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Linux

VS
VS
SymPy icon

SymPy

SymPy is a Python library for symbolic computation. It provides computer algebra capabilities either as a standalone application, as a library to other applications, or live on the web as SymPy Live or SymPy Gamma.

License: Open Source

Categories: Development Education & Reference

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Linux

Maple VS SymPy

SymPy is an open-source Python library focused on symbolic mathematics, making it a great choice for users who prefer flexibility and integration with Python. Maple, on the other hand, is a commercial software with a comprehensive user interface and advanced capabilities, ideal for users who need robust numerical and symbolic computations in a more user-friendly package.

Maple

Pros:

  • Comprehensive user interface
  • Advanced mathematical functions
  • Robust numerical algorithms
  • Highly optimized for performance
  • Wide range of built-in functions
  • Strong support for engineering applications
  • Good for commercial use
  • User-friendly for beginners
  • Excellent visualization tools
  • Long-standing reputation in academia

Cons:

  • Commercial software with a high cost
  • Can be resource-intensive
  • Less flexible than open-source alternatives
  • Not as suitable for scripting and automation
  • Steeper learning curve for advanced features
  • Fewer community-driven resources
  • Updates and support depend on licensing
  • Can be overkill for simple tasks
  • Limited customization compared to SymPy

SymPy

Pros:

  • Open-source and free
  • Easy to integrate with Python
  • Strong symbolic computation capabilities
  • Good numerical capabilities
  • Rich community support
  • Extensive documentation
  • Suitable for educational purposes
  • Lightweight compared to Maple
  • Flexible for scripting and automation
  • Good for research and development

Cons:

  • Less user-friendly for beginners
  • Limited advanced graphical capabilities
  • Performance can lag with very large datasets
  • Requires Python knowledge
  • Not as feature-rich as Maple
  • Fewer commercial applications
  • Limited support for certain engineering tasks
  • Can be slower for certain computations compared to Maple
  • Less polished user interface

Compare Maple

vs
Freemat vs Maple
Compare Freemat and Maple and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
fxSolver vs Maple
Compare fxSolver and Maple and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
GMDH Shell vs Maple
Compare GMDH Shell and Maple and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Julia vs Maple
Compare Julia and Maple and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Mathcad vs Maple
Compare Mathcad and Maple and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Mathematica vs Maple
Compare Mathematica and Maple and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Maxima vs Maple
Compare Maxima and Maple and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
R (programming language) vs Maple
Compare R (programming language) and Maple and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Sage vs Maple
Compare Sage and Maple and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
IBM SPSS Statistics vs Maple
Compare IBM SPSS Statistics and Maple and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Spyder vs Maple
Compare Spyder and Maple and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Swift Calcs vs Maple
Compare Swift Calcs and Maple and decide which is most suitable for you.