Midomi VS AudioTag
AudioTag is primarily focused on audio recognition with strong commercial use rights and API access, making it suitable for developers and businesses. Midomi, on the other hand, excels in user engagement, offering features like melody search and social sharing, appealing more to casual users looking for song discovery.
Midomi
Pros:
- Allows melody-based searching
- Includes lyrics search functionality
- Strong social features for sharing
- Community contributions enhance database
- User feedback system improves accuracy
- Web-based and easy access
- Mobile app available for convenience
- Database covers a wide range of genres
- Offers a unique melody search feature
- Free to use with basic features
Cons:
- Limited audio upload support
- No commercial use rights
- Requires internet connection for use
- Accuracy can vary based on the quality of the input
- Less comprehensive for audio file recognition compared to competitors
- May not support all audio formats
AudioTag
Pros:
- Comprehensive audio recognition capabilities
- Supports audio file uploads
- Offers API access for developers
- Large database of songs
- User-friendly interface
- Integrates with various music services
- Supports multiple audio formats
- Commercial use rights available
- Maintains history of searches
- Custom tagging feature
Cons:
- Limited social features
- No lyric search option
- No melody-based search
- Lacks offline capabilities
- Custom tagging may be confusing for some users
- Not as strong in community engagement
Compare Midomi
Compare MusicBrainz Picard and Midomi and decide which is most suitable for you.
