MikroTik RouterOS vs Tomato : Which is Better?

MikroTik RouterOS icon

MikroTik RouterOS

MikroTik RouterOS is the operating system of RouterBOARD. Developed by MikroTik

License: Commercial

Apps available for Online Self-Hosted

VS
VS
Tomato icon

Tomato

Tomato is a small, lean and simple replacement firmware for Linksys' WRT54G/GL/GS, Buffalo WHR-G54S/WHR-HP-G54 and other Broadcom-based routers. Developed by Polarcloud

License: Free

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Linux Discontinued

MikroTik RouterOS VS Tomato

MikroTik RouterOS is a powerful and highly configurable operating system suited for advanced networking tasks, while Tomato is a user-friendly firmware option ideal for home users and small offices. MikroTik offers more features and capabilities but comes with a steeper learning curve, whereas Tomato provides simplicity and ease of use but lacks some advanced functionalities.

MikroTik RouterOS

Pros:

  • Highly configurable
  • Strong routing capabilities
  • Supports a wide range of protocols
  • Robust security features
  • Advanced traffic control
  • Comprehensive monitoring tools
  • Excellent performance on low-end hardware
  • Frequent updates and community support
  • Good for enterprise-level networking
  • Extensive documentation and tutorials

Cons:

  • Complex for beginners
  • Steeper learning curve
  • Can be overkill for simple tasks
  • Requires more technical knowledge
  • Licensing cost for advanced features
  • Hardware-dependent performance
  • Less intuitive web interface
  • Can be overwhelming with options
  • Not as user-friendly as Tomato
  • Requires familiarity with networking concepts

Tomato

Pros:

  • User-friendly interface
  • Easy to set up and manage
  • Lightweight and efficient
  • Ideal for home and small office use
  • Strong community support
  • Customizable through third-party firmware
  • Good bandwidth monitoring tools
  • Works well on consumer-grade routers
  • Faster learning curve for beginners
  • Excellent for basic networking needs

Cons:

  • Limited advanced features
  • Less suitable for complex networking
  • Fewer routing protocols supported
  • Not ideal for enterprise use
  • May lack some security features
  • Performance may vary on different hardware
  • Limited customization compared to RouterOS
  • Less frequent updates
  • Not as feature-rich as MikroTik
  • Less capable in high-demand environments

Compare MikroTik RouterOS

vs
Compare DD-WRT and MikroTik RouterOS and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare OpenWrt and MikroTik RouterOS and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare pfSense and MikroTik RouterOS and decide which is most suitable for you.