MPlayer vs UMPlayer

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

MPlayer icon

MPlayer

MPlayer is a highly versatile, free, and open-source multimedia player renowned for its extensive codec support and powerful command-line interface. It can handle a wide array of media formats with minimal system resources. by The MPlayer Team

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux BSD AmigaOS Xfce MorphOS
Screenshots:
VS
UMPlayer icon

UMPlayer

UMPlayer is a free and open-source cross-platform media player that boasts a built-in search for YouTube and Shoutcast radio, offering a wide range of supported formats and features like automatic subtitle downloads and customizable playback options. by Ori Rejwan

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux BSD
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

MPlayer and UMPlayer are both powerful solutions in their space. MPlayer offers mplayer is a highly versatile, free, and open-source multimedia player renowned for its extensive codec support and powerful command-line interface. it can handle a wide array of media formats with minimal system resources., while UMPlayer provides umplayer is a free and open-source cross-platform media player that boasts a built-in search for youtube and shoutcast radio, offering a wide range of supported formats and features like automatic subtitle downloads and customizable playback options.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

MPlayer

MPlayer

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Exceptional codec support out-of-the-box.
Highly efficient and lightweight on system resources.
Powerful and flexible command-line interface for advanced control.
Supports a wide range of media formats and sources.
Ad-free and open-source.

Limitations

Command-line interface can be intimidating for new users.
Graphical interface options are often less polished than modern players.
UMPlayer

UMPlayer

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Plays almost all audio and video formats without extra codecs.
Integrated search and streaming for YouTube and Shoutcast.
Automatic subtitle searching and downloading feature.
Lightweight and portable options available.
Customizable interface with skinnable themes.
Resumes playback from the last position.

Limitations

User interface can appear somewhat dated compared to modern players.
Media library features are basic compared to dedicated managers.
Development activity might not be as frequent as some other open-source projects.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare